Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlexFurman/Archive

16 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

It seems improbable to me that a rarely accessed page such as List of Pomodoro Technique software would be the first article accessed by a new editor. The fact that they're editing this page shortly after Alex was blocked, made a similar type of inappropriate edit, and left an edit summary that seems grammatically similar to those left by Alex while the article itself is at AFD (and CSD) just seems too coincidental for my tastes. DonIago (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Involved user comment - Improbable is stating it lightly in my opinion. Behaviour seems pretty much identical--removing of an deletion template (which on its own is a pretty improbable action as second edit of a new user), similar mistakes in use of English, similar syntax of sentences, near-identical reasoning and lack of understanding/accepting policy regarding the dealing with templates (which, as a CSD, they'd be permitted to remove if they're not the article's creator, but this looks to me like the article's creator under a new name). Sounds like a DUCK to me. Not sure if a check for sleepers is necessary at this point. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock blocked, master warned. Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 12:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)