Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alicewond/Archive

01 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users All of these users seem to be intent on reverting constructive edits made by.  Dwpaul  Talk   05:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
DeltaQuad, does that mean there was no connection to user:Uniquark9? --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

The edit repeated by (which was reverted by Kansas Bear) was originally made by, who also seems to take a special interest in articles about Mongolia. Any relationship there?  Dwpaul  Talk   22:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Clear stalking and all blocked. With this many socks afoot I believe there is a case to be made for a CheckUser sweep for sleepers. Favonian (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * We should also try to identify who the sockmaster is, two possible suspects are Uniquark9 or Madyas, based on the articles where the socks keep reverting User:Kansas Bear's edits.Rajmaan (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * - Endorsing to check for sleepers and to try to establish the possible connection between this case and WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Uniquark9.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  02:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It's all proxy usage. Only other account I could find was . -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  05:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The accounts have been tagged and the proxies blocked. Mike V • Talk 17:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I moved the case to the "Alicewond" title, as that is the oldest account. I also re-tagged all accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Please, provide some diffs to show connection between and .  Vanjagenije   (talk)  23:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * See 1, 2,3,4,5,6,7, etc., where edits by the principals are bold.  Dwpaul  Talk   23:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)


 * - Could we check Alicewond against based on this and ?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  00:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no proxy use by that account, so without evidence to indicate the home editing location of the user, i'm going to say it's not related. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  04:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * With the recent accounts checked and situated, I'm reclosing the case now. Mike V • Talk 23:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)