Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amagency/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All accounts have recently edited Marcis Liors Skadmanis after a COI template was added on the article.


 * Amagency's first-ever Wiki edit in 2016 is about the organization associated with Skadmanis, his school, and his sister. This account created his LV article in 2016.
 * Melisa009112's edits are almost exclusively about Skadmanis, his school, and siblings. It is the same account has been a major contributor to the subject's Wikidata. It is also the same profile that created Skadmanis ES, added edits to LV article in 2017 and created his ZH article in 2018.
 * Zagota009 - this account was recently signed up, only a month after a COI tag was added on Skadmanis article and have recently added edits in the said article and not many contributions apart from the ones in Skadmanis article. Infogapp1 (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Three accounts editing about the same family sure looks suspicious and I'm pretty sure that we're dealing with COI editing of some sort, but it's also possible that this is meatpupptery, and I'd like to know which for when I hand out warnings and/or blocks. Checkuser endorsed. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * is ✅ to, , and . is a  match.--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP editor just recently removed the Advert tag from World NGO Day, topic closely associated to the topics edited by Amagency and linked accounts despite  previously noting that the language is promotional in nature. It may be worth noting as well that this particular IP may as well have violated NPA towards another editor: Sɛvɪnti faɪv. Infogapp1 (talk) 15:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The IP seems to mirror what the sock accounts have been doing, but that's all I can say. I'm not sure it's worth blocking. Maybe some of the affected articles should be evaluated whether they shouldn't be nominated for deletion. Drmies (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed with Drmies, especially since the IP hasn't edited in several days. Closing, if further discussion is needed on how to deal with these articles I recommend taking it to WP:COIN. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)