Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Editing same pages and similar abusive behaviour in edit summaries Sid95Q (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yep, that's them. Blocked and tagged, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  13:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Girth Summit: How about ? Cf. Special:Permalink/1086806120. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Possible. They overlap on a number of very wide ranges, but with different UAs. Dragondollx is ✅ to however, and if it's of interest, they attempted (unsuccessfully) to log into  earlier today before logging in as Dragondollx - make of that what you will.  Girth Summit  (blether)  14:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar name and editing same pages like other socks. Sid95Q (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged with no TPA for sock (matching master who was trolling and making personal attacks). Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
I blocked and tagged new account AK24M yesterday based on behavior. Today Jaat24 (notice the 24 in both usernames) started editing the same pages and creating new pages in the same topic area. Jaat24 is not a new account. They are older than the master. However, there is a 7-month gap in their edits from October 29, 2021, until today. Everyone is editing the same articles and topics, but Cartoon Network (Indian TV channel) stands out. The two listed socks, the master, and another sock, User:Jk deenu, have all edited the article this month. AK24M made this edit, part of which is identical to this edit by Jaat24. Various mobile platforms are used by all accounts. I am requesting a CU to sort all this out. Bbb23 (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuu Haru Angelo (talk • contribs) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

He mentioned that "I support Jaat24 and dsrtg"|hereYuu Haru Angelo (talk) 10:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - per filer. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 13:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Logokalog, Jaat24, and AK24M are all ✅ to each other. Amanheheh337 is  to that group.  Drtsgh is .  Since I was here, I looked at some of the accounts in the archive.  Logokaalog should get retagged as ✅ to the first group.   Looks like Amanheheh337 is the oldest account, but I'll leave the moving, blocking and retagging to a clerk. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved case to oldest account. - please indef Amanheheh337 and Jaat24 per the CU results. (Note that Jaat24 was previously named "Aman9211420"...) I'll deal with retagging, etc. after the accounts are blocked. Thanks,  Spicy (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked the master and Jaat24 per request. Bbb23 (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The account rename eliminates any doubts I had about Amanheheh337, so I'm re-blocking as checkuser blocks. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Retagged other accounts, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Pro-forma from unblock request. Confirmed. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets
Editing same pages and a previous sock left this message on a user's talk page  Sid95Q (talk) 07:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sock account of this user has posted links of Instagram accounts  with names like social..., Socialist etc. Sid95Q (talk) 10:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I am confused as to the relevance of the diff you posted. The user you are reporting hasn't left any user talk messages. Could you enlighten us? Thanks. firefly  ( t · c ) 10:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, right, thanks - seems rather tenuous to me, but I've not looked too closely. firefly  ( t · c ) 10:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * - like Firefly I'm not really sure what the significance of the 'socialist' stuff is meant to be, but I think there is enough grounds for suspicion based on the page overlap with previous socks, creation of similar articles (compare Draft:List of programmes broadcasted by Cartoon Network Pakistan to List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network Hindi by Jaat24) and the fact that this account was created one day after the last SPI to endorse Checkuser. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- RoySmith (talk) 22:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User said "Do you know what is anime. anime is also an animation it is called japanese animations Undid revision 1090748476 by Yuu Haru Angelo (talk)" and here he is removing the sub-category anime and animated. Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 06:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 02:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 02:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved out of archive. . Please follow the instructions at the top of WP:SPI when filing; please do not file directly to the archive. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 02:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * -TPA per case notice. as suspected; feel free to make that proven if you prefer, DFO. Re-pinging Yuu Haru Angelo because the first one didn't go through; please see my comment above. Closing.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 02:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar editing style like removing redirect from this page Sid95Q (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't know about this. My friend informed me about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Sidhu (talk • contribs) 15:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Editing same pages as previous socks. User page User:Titansverse is identical to previous sock Sid95Q (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Fake arguments just redirected that page to Warner Bros. Discovery India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titansverse (talk • contribs) 15:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Just noting that the user (as Logokalog) submitted an ArbCom appeal that has been denied. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 08:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks KevinL .  -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 13:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Removed redirect from Toonami (Indian TV channel) with same edit summary  like previous socks. Sid95Q (talk) 12:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please check my work. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 13:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirmed: and  to previously identified . I will block and tag where appropriate. --Yamla (talk) 10:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Identical user page to his other sockpuppets Ilhamnobi (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅,  Girth Summit  (blether)  07:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
User is removing the sub-section "Animated series" and "Anime" in List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network (India). Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 03:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

User is personally attacking me in the edit summary and writting same kind of edit summary. Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 02:06, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

User removing content from same page. Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Both user and blocked sock mentioned "cyberbullying". Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yes, In India it is mentioned everyone have right to take legal actions. CN India airing teleshopping that is why I removed heads. This user is not mentioning his personal attacks on me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Old9211 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and taggged. Leaving CU request. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * --holy moly. OK, yeah, confirmed (with User:DD012), but the two ranges they're on are a frigging mess, with tons of SPIs listed in the logs. As it happens I blocked two of those ranges this morning, following 's block of User:Wikilovestransparency, who I think is a different editor engaged in different assholery. I don't think there's a point in going through the larger ranges than the ones I blocked, unless there's a CU who gets paid to do it. As far as I'm concerned, we hardblock the /32 or even the /23 ranges, which already have partial blocks on them; I really DGAF anymore. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Much as I enjoy the colorful language, what do you want done with the report? Unless you want another CU to review it, how about closing it? Did you know that DGAF is an acronym of DAGF?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅. There is no point in looking for a harder block, I think. I'd like someone to close this, thanks. Drmies (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Likely a sockpuppet of his other sockpuppet, Old9211. Ilhamnobi (talk) 02:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

User editing same page like blocked socks. Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 12:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

User asking personal information like name, mobile no, instagram id same as blocked socks. Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Bbb23 Okay, Thanks for letting me now. But do I have to add new report now? Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 13:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bbb23 Should this case be closed now if nothing could be done? Ilhamnobi (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This account has not edited for over a year, and a check is not possible. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 03:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural note: should not have reopened the closed report but added a new one.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Unless a clerk asks you to do so, no. My comment was intended to make sure no one reviewing the report was confused and to educate you about the appropriate procedure. While I'm at it, any comments you make should be in the comments section, not here; I've moved it.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged NomNom100. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar userpage to his other sockpuppets. Adds poorly sourced or unsourced content like his other socks. Ilhamnobi (talk) 12:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I was checking the old revision of List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network (India) and I realised that Drtsgh made same kind of edit. Yuu Haru Angelo (talk) 18:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * The possible sockpuppet's userpage and his confirmed sockpuppet's userpage - Both have userboxes, current date and time, and editor badge displays.
 * Frequently edits Turner India-related pages like one of his previous sockpuppets Ilhamnobi (talk) 06:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - Hi,  contributed to the page of Colors Rishtey . After blocking him in the case of Sockpuppet. You deleted his contributed information . Right after that user  added it back to that page.  - PravinGanechari (talk) 12:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi , I think  is also a member of this group. Because  wrote  "Dragymon" on 's user page. on 10 April 2022. But you have removed the same information on 6th May .  has written this name back on 25 May on his own user page . ( So ​​the question is, how did the previous user know its name ). PravinGanechari (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Compare user page of  and  . Information is also similar. There is also a similarity in the page created. ( Nick ) PravinGanechari (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Regarding the case Yuu Haru Angelo saying to me that edit look like a way between both you and those shocks as the shocks are coming for what? Just to add the box information(regarding Dates,Current season/arc) while on the other hand you removed them by saying that Indian Wiki pages don't add info like (original programming, acquired programming etc) so I just added that date,season/arc information with dividing them into (animated programming, anime programming) like you always told them that Indian pages divides shows in animated programming and anime. Drtsgh (talk) 2:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
''' This case is being reviewed by MarioGom as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate. '''
 * -, please provide evidence of similarities in the form of diffs between the reported user and socks. At first glance, it looks like OWCA files and certain socks disagree (see history on OWCA files's Talk page and a complaint by OWCA files at User talk:Yuu Haru Angelo). Bbb23 (talk) 14:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * - The filer has now provided some evidence of similarities. However, because of the contradiction I pointed out and because this user has escaped detection for quite some time, despite checks being run in the interim, I think it best to confirm and look for any other missed accounts. Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Drtsgh was checked on May 31, 2022, and found to be "unlikely". They have edited since then.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * - for training -- RoySmith (talk) 01:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * . I'm not giving much weight to the username on Drtsgh's user page. Other than that, there are enough signals indicating this is either one person, or two kids with some sort of off-wiki coordination. Let's check them and see if we can untangle this mess. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I've looked at these two accounts. These isn't a smoking gun, but they both overlap with each other, and with multiple previous Amanheheh337 socks, on multiple (wide) IP ranges. The user agents don't match, but then Amanheheh337 socks have used a whole bunch of different UAs in the last few months. Based purely on the technical data, I'd say . - what do you think we should do, based on the editing (which I haven't looked at).   Girth Summit  (blether)  17:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for checking. Given the somewhat contradictory evidence, and the weakness of CU results, I think it's best to let this go without action. MarioGom (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing without action. MarioGom (talk) 17:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Editing same topics plus name similar to previous socks like User:Logokalog Sid95Q (talk) 06:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- RoySmith (talk) 23:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 23:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Confessed Sock puppetry and Meat puppetry on my talk page Sid95Q (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, indef the account, revoke talk page and email access. I'm endorsing checkuser just in case there are some visible sleepers. MarioGom (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda (she/her)  04:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * - Please, indef the account, revoke talk page and email access. MarioGom (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * --Blablubbs (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Making same kind of edits like blocked socks.Yuugone (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

. The lady doth protest too much. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 02:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Making same kind of edit like blocked socks in List of children's television channels in South Asia. Yuugone (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Personal attack in edit summary like they always used to do. Yuugone (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Drtsgh said the same thing like confirmed socks in their defence when they were suspected. Yuugone (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Personal attack on my talk page. Yuugone (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Personal attack in edit summary. Yuugone (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Because those people have written the same thing it doesn't make them my accounts. Anyone can do this intentionally *maybe* you are doing this intentionally to get my account blocked because even when in past other administrators have said that those sockpuppets are not mine you're still after me. Drtsgh (talk) 07:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @DatGuy Yes please, delete all the revisions. Yuugone (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Spicy I added Drtsgh because they said exactly the same thing like blocked socks Yuugone (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Yuugone What's the problem you have with me!!
 * Logokalog wrote this on user page but it was removed by Bbb23, then you added the same information on your user page, so the question is how does Logokalog knew that you have a Youtube channel and Instagram account named "Dragymon"? Yuugone (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged, leaving CU request. Bbb23 (talk) 02:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * - these are all blocked, but they are creating socks at a rapid pace, so I'd like a sleeper check. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 04:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I looked at this yesterday and got immediately lost in what I was looking at, so I'm definitely useless for the sleeper check. What I can say is that are  to each other and  are  to each other. I'll leave this at endorsed for someone who knows more about what they're doing. Izno (talk) 23:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd go a bit further and call the first group ✅, also:
 * For the second group, I'll add the indistinguishable
 * Who seems clearly related based on the username.
 * Finally, looking at the case archives:
 * Group 1 is very very to the master, to the point where I'd be comfortable tagging as confirmed.
 * Group 1 and group 2 are very much to each other, but not very conclusive.
 * Accordingly, group 2 is also to the master.
 * . --Blablubbs (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I also think confirmed to each other for group 1 is a reasonable assessment. Izno (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * blocked as well. I only got the gist of the PA on your talk page and I don't speak Hindi/Kannada, but let me know if it deserves to be revision deleted. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * DVRST is very very to group 1 and the master, as is . --Blablubbs (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Tagged the blocked accounts, closing., you added Drtsgh to the case after it had been actioned. Please do not do this. That account has been checked before and found unlikely to Amanheheh337. Spicy (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * blocked as well. I only got the gist of the PA on your talk page and I don't speak Hindi/Kannada, but let me know if it deserves to be revision deleted. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * DVRST is very very to group 1 and the master, as is . --Blablubbs (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Tagged the blocked accounts, closing., you added Drtsgh to the case after it had been actioned. Please do not do this. That account has been checked before and found unlikely to Amanheheh337. Spicy (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Newly created account, userpage is almost same like previous socks. TheAmazingD said that admin (Bbb13) is your friend and Supertor is asking an admin to be his friend. Yuugone (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. The other pretty obvious connection is Dahiya (surname). Izno (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * And closing. Looked for sleepers and didn't see any. Izno (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Newly created account and his first edit was same as blocked sock. Yuugone (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looks . That combined with the behaviour is enough for me to block. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Newly created account, same behaviour also they mentioned that OWCA files is their account. Yuugone (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'm pretty sure OWCA Files is using a distinct IP address to avoid suspicion. His behavior cannot be considered different from Amanheheh337 and his socks. Ilhamnobi (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * What you think about Drtsgh? I think they are also a sockpuppet of Amanheheh337. Yuugone (talk) 11:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, he has been found unlikely, but I am also concerned about him too. At least his behavior is not as extreme as Amanheheh. Ilhamnobi (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * OWCA files is to Amanheheh337. BulletRaja420 is  to Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala and I suppose  to Amanheheh337 but . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 22:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged OWCA files. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
New account, userpage is almost same. They added alot of things on their userpage same as some of blocked socks. Yuugone (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Same editing pattern. Yuugone (talk) 07:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

I know Drtsgh was checked before and found unlikely but Amanheheh337 said on my userpage that They are Dragymon's (Drtsgh) account on Hindi Wikipedia. So I think CU should check once again. Yuugone (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Their behaviour is also same and Logokalog wrote this on Drtsgh's user page but it was removed by Bbb23, then Drtsgh added the same information on their user page, so the question is how does Logokalog knew that Drtsgh has a Youtube channel and Instagram account named "Dragymon"? Yuugone (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Amanheheh337 admitted meatpupptery and also admitted that Drtsgh and OWCA files are same person on my talk page on Hindi Wikipedia. Yuugone (talk) 16:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yuugone (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

What's the meaning of This. Here this Yuu is saying to that Sockpuppet to admit that My Account and that OWCA FILES account is of that Sockpuppet??? It clearly means that this Kid wants me to stop editing Wikipedia Anyhow.. So he could edit pages as he wants!! Drtsgh (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Amanheheh337 was personally attacking me on Hindi Wikipedia then I complained to an admin there and admin blocked him and deleted old revisions. Yuugone (talk) 14:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

No, I don't think Zendrago is a sockpuppet of Amanheheh. I just checked his edits, does not edit Turner India pages often as Aman's socks did. He mostly just modifies his userboxes and some other shit like that. He also does not go as extreme as Aman. I also know that he has a YouTube channel, and tbh his videos are pretty good. Ilhamnobi (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, the link to the supposed admission by the master that is one of their socks does not work (it says that the page is deleted at hi.wiki). @Drtsgh, your link also doesn't work for apparently the same reason.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That's fine,, but we can't see what it said. Perhaps you can get a hi.wiki admin to post here the relevant part.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * A couple of things to point out here. First, Drtsgh was not found "unlikely" but "possilikely". Second the latest link provided by Yuugone is an admission by the master on en.wiki that OCWA files and Drtsgh belong to them. Based on that admission, I am blocking and tagging Drtsgh. I have not looked at the other two listed suspected socks, and I have left the CU request in place. Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Just passing by, so I'll leave the others for someone else to evaluate, but is confirmed to group 2 from the 3 February SPI. Blocked.  --Blablubbs (talk) 09:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * otherwise with . -- Amanda (she/her)  12:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * otherwise with . -- Amanda (she/her)  12:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * otherwise with . -- Amanda (she/her)  12:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * otherwise with . -- Amanda (she/her)  12:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Tagged blocked accounts, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 11:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Newly created account, same editing interest, userpage is also same. Yuugone (talk) 07:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , but it's really no more than being in the same large country. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Two different people may have been mixed up under this master, but regardless the behaviour is sufficiently similar for a block. as suspected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)

This user asked on talk page of User:Ponyo that is Chandan Madan (actor) banned or not .It looks suspicious how an user who is new to wikipedia knows that article can be banned or not. ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
 * My friend was also new Wikipedia user, he created an article but this article is banned and that's reason his account is blocked. So don't let this happen to me, that's why I asked, think again and accuse me RONITkuamr (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to the blocked sock . I guess this makes then a sock of Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337?-- Ponyo bons mots 17:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Filing moved from Sockpuppet investigations/Dmjoshi12. Spicy (talk) 09:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Tagged, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Later reclassified as a sock of Dmjoshi12, see . Thanks, Spicy (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same username as master. Yuugone (talk) 08:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Also Stalking behavior like their blocked socks. Yuugone (talk) 09:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Shouldn't this case be closed by now? It's been a long time since I filled this case. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Aman131027 is to Kamran Narmak, but it's really such a poor match that any block would have to be justified on behavioral evidence alone. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Nobody has seen fit to issue a behavioral block, and Aman131027 hasn't edited in almost 6 months, so closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Editing same page in same editing manner.

Editing same pages.

Same behaviour — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zendrago X (talk • contribs) 13:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

No response from many days. Please investigate them. If they are then block them, if not then tell them so that they can edit. Please don't take it too long — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zendrago X (talk • contribs) 09:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The IP edits are too old. Closing.

Suspected sockpuppets
Same copying behavior from other's userpage. Promoting their YouTube channel like blocked socks. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 10:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Also they reverted my this edit and said "No proper source." in edit summary but my edit was accurate, It seems like they are stalking me like they did before. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Zendrago X mentioned this at ANI, I'm mentioning it here so it isn't missed when judging what to do. Note looking at Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337/Archive, it seems Zendrago X was checked before and if I understand correctly considered unlikely as a sock of this master during that check. Nil Einne (talk) 12:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I have contested in Hindi Wikipedia adminship so I had to create my userpage at Hindi Wikipedia  so i used some sources from other users who had already contested here in past. But by mistake I pasted everthing on my ENG Wikipedia userpage. And this guy got a chance to get me in these things. &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    12:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I reverted his edits because there was no source there and he reverted my edit by saying me that there is no proper source then i became a good person and started giving sources. But same thing he did so i reverted his edits Tit for Tat because he also not added sources there &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    12:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I never said that I have a channel here, I added my name there because yes they were my videos and because of Copyrights I have to add my name because I'm copyright owner of it and I added name there, suppose if the channel was not mine then you can see I gave copyright to copyright owner which is according to law. But the channel was mine, so I added my name there. I never asked anyone, and myself I did not promote channel here. these all socks are fake they were blocked because they were sock of Amanheheh337, and he is not having any channel so it is a logic that how his socks could have channels? I added a video in there which was not to promote that because I don't know against Wiki's guidelines. &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;   (contact)    12:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I was proved unlikely here already so why he added me here? Why he is interested in my User Page ? That is question that asked at Wikipedia admin's noticeboard. &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;   (contact)    12:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I think they should be re-checked, their behaviour is so similar. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There is no basis for revisiting this. Closing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbb23 (talk • contribs)
 * FWIW, I had looked at this earlier today and came to the same conclusion. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
New account, same editing interest and pattern. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 08:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Alot of blocked socks and Anikas hs has contributed to Discovery Kids (Indian TV channel) and List of programmes broadcast by Discovery Kids (India). Ajeeb Prani (talk) 06:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Nowtype has contributed alot to List of programmes broadcast by Sony YAY! just like some of their socks. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

The sock is calling me Hello "Ak Shit" and the previous sock named Jaat24 told his name as same. . The sock is sharing same editing patterns and behavior. One of the sock was abusing me on Hindi Wikipedia by calling me "Yuu".

See this, one of the sock of sockmaster was calling a user by strange names. The sockmaster uses socks to call anyone with strange name.

Editing in same manner and editing same pages. &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;   (contact)    09:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Ajeeb Prani (talk) 10:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure why Anikas hs called you "Akshit" but originally my username was "Yuu Haru Angelo" and once I tried to change my username from "Yuu Haru Angelo" to "M S Hassan" (back then I didn't know how to change username) so I'm sure that NomNom100 stalked my user page and talk page that's why they called me M S Hassan. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 11:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ajeeb Prani I have no idea why he called me that, but this sock master has strange behavior don't know for what intentions he called me that. Actually this he did on my talk page few days ago, then I reverted it, after that today at ANI I checked a link there where a sock was calling himself that.  &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    12:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Similarity in name (Nowtype-Typingagain) and editing same pages in same behaviour. Both joined just 2-3 months ago. &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;   (contact)    13:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @RoySmith As you tagged the as "More Information is Required", so now there is enough information is provided to investigate it now, please remove the tag to CU-Open. Thanks  &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    12:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - This needs more than "New account, same editing interest and pattern" to justify a check. Is there anything more specific? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Did a bit investigating myself, and there are some weak similarities but the problem I have is that this is a pretty generic editing pattern (e.g  by the reporter). Other again weak similarities are  and  and  which resembles additions made by other socks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have serious reservations about this SPI in general. It seems like the filers tend to report any newish account that edits popular Indian cartoon articles, and I'm fairly sure that a few users have been incorrectly blocked under this case before. In addition, although I may be wrong, I get the impression that some of the players involved know each other off-wiki and may have ulterior motives behind these reports (see previous filings referencing social media accounts etc.) The conduct of the alleged socks is often not all that more disruptive than the filers'. I would be disinclined to act on any report in this case that doesn't present clear and convincing evidence. Spicy (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Both of you are disrupting this report. You must stop. Unless you have something new to add or wish to tweak one of your own comments, you leave the report alone. Ajeeb Prani, you cannot refactor other users' comments. Zendrago X, you cannot change the status of the case or anything else that has been set by an administrator, SPI clerk, or CheckUser.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Looking over all this again, I certainly don't see enough to justify a check, or any action. Closing. RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Ever since they created their account they started editing Warner Bros. Discovery India which was created by DESIULTRA one of the blocked sockpuppet also Amanheheh337 wanted to changed their name to YuuGoSock and Yuugonck and their name is "Yuukedits" they have "Yuu" in common. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 13:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * So if 'Yuu' is comman then you are one of them. Please see this Yuugone and  Yuu Haru Angelo, your name was Yuugone and Yuu Haru Angelo. Means you are also one of them.


 * Yuu means gentleness," "kindness," or "excellence and my name means Excellence edits. I made edits to that page as this page is notable and I did research for it. I am a new user I will slowly start to edit other pages too.
 * How did you know that my former name was "Yuugone" and how did you find that you are reported here? A new editor wouldn't know much about sockpuppetry and maybe you chose "Yuukedits" on purpose. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 15:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Ajeeb Prani I checked that Amanheheh337 talk page. There was written Yuugone in a section, that page was linked with you. Yuukedits (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know what is this Yuukedits (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * This ID is a sockpuppet as this utilizer is editing same pages. That page was engendered by sockpuppet. You can check history of that page, It was edited by virtually all sockpuppets. I am sure this id is a sock and doing something to engender handle this Id. That page should also be deleted. As on that there are too much sock edits. And the page was created by a Sockpuppet. &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    16:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @ZDX Wow, what is logic in this, that page is notable that is why I edited it and I came here after watching Ajeeb Prani's edits. Yuukedits (talk) 03:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @Ajeeb Prani and @Zendrago X. I would like to bring one thing to you people's notice. I have noticed a similarity in unblock requests of @Yuukedits and @Marxist Economist. Please see User talk:Marxist Economist and User talk:Yuukedits. I hope it might be of your help. Same language. Same legal threat. Same lure to make donations. Same accusations on reporting user and blocking admin. Everything is same. I am tagging admins/checkusers who blocked Marxist Economist and turned down his unblock request. and .  Shaan Sengupta Talk 14:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Shaan Sengupta Its peculiar that this utilizer looks kindred to both sockmasters. Yes his unblock request was same as Marxist Economist, may be he is a sockpuppet of Marxist Economist. But his deportment is additionally like  Amanheheh337. Marxist Economist mainly edited only political pages but this utilizer is editing other pages that is withal making him homogeneous to Amanheheh337. Either he is a sockpuppet of Amanheheh337 or Marxist economist or it is someone else. Maybe these two sockmasters ken each other and they have orchestrated to inscribe all this. I too reported Marxist Economist once to admin board as he was promoting his party but nothing happened, his unblock request was same which denotes they ken each other. These 2 users are currently blocked.   &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    10:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Zendrago X only a checkuser can confirm whose sock this is. I added this in the case checkusers result is likely then it will serve as a behavioural evidence.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 11:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Callanecc you said that Yuukedits is confirmed to Amanheheh337. And possible to Marxist Economist. Their behavioural evidence by seeing their unblock request matches too. By any chance is it possible that Marxist Economist too is a sock (not sockmaster as we know) of Amanheheh337. Are they all connected by any chance?  Shaan Sengupta Talk 12:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I think Amanheheh337 (and their socks) and Marxist Economist (and their socks) may be different person but they know eachother off-wiki as one of the sock admitted meat puppetry also their editing interest are different. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ajeeb Prani @Shaan Sengupta What if he edited those pages for incrementing his edits to access bulwarked pages. Most of pages he edited were forfended. So to get autoconfirmed access he edited those pages, I am not sure.  &maltese; ZenDragoX&maltese;    (contact)    14:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe. Only checkusers can find this. I would request @Callanecc to do this since he is the one who had checked this.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 17:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I suspect that Amanheheh337 and Marxist Economist are the person (it might be meatpuppetry) but they are technically to each other. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Callanecc then its purely your and admins call what to do.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 05:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sure it's meat puppetry cause Amanheheh337's sockpuppet confessed meat puppetry many times.  Ajeeb Prani (talk) 08:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yuukedits is ✅ to Amanheheh337. They are to Marxist Economist. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Closing. MarioGom (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Adding infobox information for Toonami in Cartoon Network (Indian TV channel) like blocked sock. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 05:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * They have also edited HBO Defined which was created by DESIULTRA. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 08:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Pretty gosh-darned to the last sock - blocked and tagged.   Girth Summit  (blether)  16:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Anikas hs made the same edit as OWCA files M S Hassan (talk) 08:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Jaat24 said My real name is akshit and Anikas hs said Hello akshit on a user's talk page. M S Hassan (talk) 08:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is a duck. either way. Ran check for current sleepers and it's not worth the fight. --  Amanda (she/her)  07:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)