Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amanjol/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Both users made their first edit on 20 June 2016. Before their made their tenth edit, they had already edited Hasan al-Askari. Tair Mansur corrected a comment of Amanjol, and they both also edited in the same section of an article recently. Please also see, I suspect this has been ongoing for very long through multiple socks and/or perhaps even meatpuppets. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅  but common user agents on wide ranges, so I wouldn't be surprised if I missed some. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
TwelverShii has barely made any edits (22 to be exact) and their EIA is already incredible similar to that of Amanjol and his sock:

In Hasan al-Askari, they not only restored the edit of a IP, but expanded on it as well. What's concerning, is that the IP location is exactly the same as the notorious IP ranges I reported at ANI some time ago, known for constantly IP hopping and pov-pushing in religious related articles. In the very ANI thread, I suspected Amanjol and his socks to be related to this IP location.

Moreover, the edit that TwelverShii and the IP tried to push was about this (fictional) "Hazrat Ishaan" (see also Articles for deletion/Hazrat Ishaan (title)), which I also mentioned in the ANI thread and was also pushed by Amanjol

TwelverShii didn't even respond to my allegations about him being a probable sock, instead referring to me as a "vandal"

HistoryofIran (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * . Completely different ranges, ISPs, geo-locations, and user agents. None of the ranges I looked into were on any reports of being proxies or VPNs. Resetting to 'completed', as .  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   23:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not convinced TwelverShii is a sock due to the CU results and mismatches in the behaviour. I also don't want to speculate on a possible relation to the IP, but considering TwelverShii was created in September and the rangeblock expired in May it shouldn't matter anyways. Closing without action. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)