Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amfithea/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Sliverug is a new account who has made few or no other edits outside the topic Angelique Rockas, and her Internationalist Theatre; see her/his global contributions. In both English-language WP and Greek-language WP user Sliverug follows the same behavioral pattern with user Kyrilo36, a confirmed puppet of Amfithea, revealed after I filed this case of editiwar last July. User Sliverug's contributions to the articles Angelique Rockas, Internationalist Theatre, and Ανζελίκ Ρόκας of Greek-language WP as well, have been focusing constantly on removing Original Research and COI tags from all three articles, thus fueling an edit war exactly the same way like the then new user Kyrilo36 (so far the last confirmed puppet created by user Amfithea) did.

But there is more evidence: IP 82.1.219.198. When Kyrilo36 was vandalising the Greek article on Rockas, she/he once forgot to sign in, and, when she/he made this comment in Greek-language WP, her/his IP (82.1.219.198) was revealed, as hard evidence -judging from the IP's global contributions, and esp. this in German-language WP- that behind Kyrilo36 was Amfithea. A similar mistake that exposed her/himself had been repeated by user Sliverug in Greek-language WP. First, Sliverug removed the tags from the Greek article on Rockas. Then, CubicStar (sysop @ Greek-language WP) had the tags put back in place, summarising that there is no reason to have them removed. After that, Sliverug reacted by emptying the article (commenting: deletion), but by mistake she/he left out the two tags on top; the very next minute appeared IP 82.1.219.198 out of the blue to "do the job" that Sliverug had left unfinished: deleting the tags on top (commenting: deletion, dealing with fools)! Chalk19 (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I've locked the account (and some sleepers) given the cross-wiki nature of the abuse. Please note that the IP --> account connection cannot be publicly revealed here. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 18:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
It doesn't look like there's anything more to do here. Closing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See the edit warring complaint about Chlorissima's editing of the Angelique Rockas article. I have blocked Chlorissima one week for edit warring on the COI tags at Angelique Rockas. The edit summaries and talk comments are very reminiscent of the Amfithea socks blocked previously. User:Chalk19 who filed the AN3 gave a good summary of the background in his complaint there. He has also been following the related dispute on the Greek Wikipedia. User:Ajraddatz, a global sysop, has commented earlier in this SPI due to the cross-wiki abuse. All the socks want uploaded scans of primary paper documents to be admitted to the record to support the notability of Angelique Rockas. If the stream of new socks or meats continues it might justify a period of full or EC protection for Angelique Rockas and Internationalist Theatre, but that step is not needed just yet. If a checkuser were run, it might justify an indef block for Chlorissima. EdJohnston (talk) 15:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Additional evidence.

The way (the typing/writing) User:Chlorissima replied (see User talk:Chlorissima) after I wrote on her/his talk page a "Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion" is very similar to the way User:Angeliquerock writes in her (?) talk page at Commons, esp. the multiple signing; example:
 * "Angelique Rockas {Angeliquerock (Συζήτηση) 15:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)} {194.83.172.121 15:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC)} {Angeliquerock (Συζήτηση) 15:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)} {194.83.172.121 15:11, 30 July 2017 (UTC)} {Angeliquerock (Συζήτηση) 15:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)}"

compare:
 * "22 September 2017 (UTC)EdJohnstonChlorissima (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC) EdJohnston From User Chlorissima Chlorissima (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)ChlorissomaChlorissima (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC) I noticed that the link Invitation to Oxford has been removed, so I went to the source referred to by Scottish Theatre Archive, Angelique Rockas Flickr.com and found this album, Invitations Worth reading: https://www.flickr.com/photos/angelique_rockas/albums/72157684452850041 Thank you for your attention Chorissima Chlorissima (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)ChlorissimaChlorissima (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)"

Another stirking similarity is the pattern of using seperation lines between paragraphes/sections by typing consecutive hyphensis, in common with sockmaster's User Amfithea master puppet User Johanprof, and minor puppet Kyrilo36 (see also: Talk:Angelique Rockas and el:Συζήτηση:Ανζελίκ Ρόκας) (the Greek-language article on rockas talk page). Finally, please note my PS to the aforementioned edit warring complaint. ——Chalk19 (talk) 15:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * PS. User Chlorissima in her/his talk page writes of myself: "... a Greek editor who is not au fait with British Theatre, UK Press and workd class archives doing trying to discredit ..." . In el:Συζήτηση:Ανζελίκ Ρόκας master puppet Johanprof had addressed myself and sysop CubicStar by writing: "For your attention: I am no random editor (...) this immediate comment on the vanadlsim you are pertmitting on this entry (...) if you on Greek Wikipedia want to vandalize the Greek entry then your curating should be questioned". No comments needed about the similarity of style. ——Chalk19 (talk) 16:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I checked this on Meta again, and this is a bit of a bigger problem than this one additional account. I've locked another few related accounts:
 * - older account
 * - from last time
 * - from last time
 * - from last time
 * The 36(9) part seems to be a common thread between the account names. I'll notify some of the other projects where these accounts have edited so they are aware, but the abuse is going across ~20 other projects. All accounts locked, and the IPs globally blocked for now. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The 36(9) part seems to be a common thread between the account names. I'll notify some of the other projects where these accounts have edited so they are aware, but the abuse is going across ~20 other projects. All accounts locked, and the IPs globally blocked for now. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The 36(9) part seems to be a common thread between the account names. I'll notify some of the other projects where these accounts have edited so they are aware, but the abuse is going across ~20 other projects. All accounts locked, and the IPs globally blocked for now. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The 36(9) part seems to be a common thread between the account names. I'll notify some of the other projects where these accounts have edited so they are aware, but the abuse is going across ~20 other projects. All accounts locked, and the IPs globally blocked for now. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Dear Ajraddatz I have been thinking filing for a request at c:COM:AN/B about user Angeliquerock. ——Chalk19 (talk) 12:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * PS. There is another account with COI, "speeping" at the moment, user:John Mcarther, who in some of his (?) summaries used to write "no conflict"!, , ,  ——Chalk19 (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That one looks unused now, though is most certainly one of this pattern. It might be worth letting Commons know though that venue; I can attest to the technical evidence if you cover the behavioural. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Chlorissima has been globally locked by Ajraddatz per this link. Except for notifying Commons there doesn't appear to be anything else to do, unless an enwiki CU can think of more. EdJohnston (talk) 17:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Commons notified. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is included in your finding above, and if so[/not] is a local CU still necessary? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, clarified above. I don't imagine a local CU would find anything else, so it probably isn't necessary. They are free to check of course; I'm here to deal with the cross-wiki implications of the case, not usurp their role of investigating the local abuse. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Since Chlorissima is globally locked I agree there's no more to do here. This isn't declined, exactly, just, I don't know, moot. Case closed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another user in the "army" of puppets of sockmaster Amfithea, and SPAs who promote Angelique Rockas in several language editions of WP: User:Johanprof, User:Ortocarlo, User:Kyrilo36, User:Sliverug, User:Chlorissima, User:Boris369 (all blocked globally), and the not-to-forget (uninvestigated) case of user Angeliquerock at Commons. For the abovementioned puppets, please take a look at:
 * 1) User:Kyrilo36 reported by User:Chalk19
 * 2) User:Chlorissima reported by User:Chalk19
 * 3) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amfithea/Archive (2 cases filed)

It's not only the global contributions of user Kotlenci that points to the dicection of another puppet. It's the same mistake that user Kotlenci, like user Kyrilo36 and user Sliverug did before, that is writing something as a registered user, and then caming back to continue but forgeting to sing in. It is the well known by now IP 82.1.219.198. When Kyrilo36 was vandalising the Greek article on Rockas, she/he once forgot to sign in, and, when she/he made this comment in Greek-language WP, her/his IP (82.1.219.198) was revealed, as hard evidence -judging from the IP's global contributions- that behind Kyrilo36 was sockmaster Amfithea. A similar mistake had been repeated by user Sliverug in Greek-language WP. First, Sliverug removed the tags from the Greek article on Rockas. Then, a sysop @ Greek-language WP) had the tags put back in place. After that, Sliverug reacted by emptying the article, but by mistake she/he left out the two tags on top; the very next minute appeared IP 82.1.219.198 to "do the job" that Sliverug had left unfinished: deleting the tags on top.

The same mistake has just happened about an hour before. User Kotlenci on 9 November 2017 at 18:49 (UTC) added an "update" to the talk page of the Angelique Rockas article, addressed to user Jmax and myself. Three minutes later, the well known IP 82.1.219.198 changed the signature of user Kotlenci to 82.1.219.198, and the time stamps from 18:49 to 18:52! QED. ——Chalk19 (talk) 19:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * PS A new SPA / puppet, Obornat, appeared right after the blocking of Kotlenci! ——Chalk19 (talk) 22:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Locked. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅ to and  to the master:
 * Blocked and tagged. Please globally lock the accounts if appropriate. Thanks. Once that's done, this report may be closed.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * All locked. Looks like I'll need to do some work with notifying the other wikis too. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I have filed a case against Angeliquerock @ Commons, but it was archived automatically before investigation (after 3 days had passed). Please, see this. ——Chalk19 (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * PS. Case re-filed at Commons, and the account is finally locked. ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Please globally lock the accounts if appropriate. Thanks. Once that's done, this report may be closed.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * All locked. Looks like I'll need to do some work with notifying the other wikis too. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I have filed a case against Angeliquerock @ Commons, but it was archived automatically before investigation (after 3 days had passed). Please, see this. ——Chalk19 (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * PS. Case re-filed at Commons, and the account is finally locked. ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * PS. Case re-filed at Commons, and the account is finally locked. ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Closing. GABgab 01:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets





 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems to be continuing contentious editing on Angelique Rockas and Internationalist Theatre. Suspect sock's first edits seem to demonstrate pre-existing experience with WP markup from the get-go.

Editing style and behaviour seems close to User:Chlorissima (previously raised here at SPI, blocked before Datintl01's first edits):
 * Tends to use frequent line breaks and lines of dashes on talk pages: Datintl01:, ; vs Chlorissima:
 * Strenuously removing COI / OR templates: Datintl01:, and other recent edits; vs Chlorissima:   Dl2000 (talk) 01:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Missed that this was already open. Merging.


 * Long history of this topic area (Angelique Rockas and Internationalist Theatre) being worked on by this family of socks. A few new accounts have recently begun working on this area to remove COI tags. 4 times here by User:Datintl01. Nescu23 is another SPI. A decent overview is here by User:Chalk19. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 06:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * There is an army of socks (more than 10 of them already globally locked) with cross-wiki abusive action who promote Rockas. Usually the socks are very agressive towards users who are exposing them. As I have shown @ Commons, behind this operatrion "most likely is Angelique Rockas, the real person" ; steward Ajraddatz knows this case, and has locked all (or most of) the previous sockpuppets globally. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * PS. You may also take a look to the Greek-language talk page of Angelique Rockas article; some dialogues (with the socks) are in English. ——Chalk19 (talk) 10:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Looking at their behaviour the use of edit summary is very similar e.g. adding an external link in square brackets, please see and . Thank you GSS  (talk |c|em ) 07:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Both these two accounts also edit peoples user pages directly. and  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The same in this case. ——Chalk19 (talk) 10:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * has blocked Nescu23 for making legal threats, but one of his last edits was to post on Doc James talk page where he accidentally wrote From   and then . GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * CU-confirmed on Meta, locked both accounts and a number of sleepers. The key patterns here are the pages edited and the cross-wiki activity. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After Nescu23 made a couple of legal threats, I looked at their article activity and socking was clear. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  11:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Appears to be a relatively experience paid editing company :-( Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 15:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  11:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  11:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * All accounts are ✅. I've blocked all but I see that I missed filing this under the oldest account which is Datintl01. Would a clerk kindly move this case to the that account name and then tag? Thank you.
 * ...or it may need merged with Sockpuppet investigations/Amfithea (didn't know that existed before filing this).
 * Likely best to merge User:Berean Hunter. I imagine they are all from the same paid editing company. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 15:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, tags updated where necessary though most were already taken care of. Closing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ to the master by way of Britzick. . There is still a case that needs to be merged into this one at Sockpuppet investigations/Nescu23.
 * Merge completed, case closed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This is the "new recruit" in Rockas Army of Sockes (for its history see: Sockpuppet investigations/Amfithea/Archive). Since the main targets of the Army of Sockes, articles Angelique Rockas and Internationalist Theatre, have been locked for users until August 3rd by Berean Hunter because of "Persistent sockpuppetry", the new sockpuppet has focused on two other articles of "Rockas interest": Griselda Gambaro, and The Camp (1967 play). With these contributions user Xanu36 restored a highly promotional section in the Gambaro article about Rockas. About its reason in this article, as a duplicate of the same section in The Camp article (instead of a shorter piece on Rockas' production), there was a discussion between myself and another user in the article's talk page. ——Chalk19 (talk) 00:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

PS. Also the same pattern with the rest of the Army of Socks while writing to talk pages with lines of dashes, chaotic structure, and peculiar ways of signing. ——Chalk19 (talk) 01:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

PS2. (update to the above PS) Also here; for a comparison, not only of the pattern but of for the content as well, see this. ——Chalk19 (talk) 11:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and blocked based on behavior.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same targets, Angelique Rockas and Internationalist Theatre. Adding same promotional crap and similar edit summaries (ie. great detail to each edit) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Duck blocked, tagged, and closing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to each other and to from the archive:

. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've unblocked Cath Writer which is using the same IP at the same time as other accounts but is using a different browser and that is the only difference. The edits are different enough that I'm giving the benefit of doubt.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See : spamming (many) user talk ages to canvas support for the Internationalist Theatre (up for AfD currently). Suggest that edit summaries from the master (e.g. "if the User bothered to open the British Library link they would see that Internationalist Theatre productions for which Ms Rockas is known are covered - and there is a separate Wikipedia entry fir this important company") and the the probable sock ("There is a main space article on Angelique Rockas this draft page of more than 2 yrs ago is redundant and should be deleted.") are rather similar in style. —— SerialNumber  54129  15:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
has echoed the sock's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=864487685#Why_has_Internationalist_Theatre_a_main_space_Wikipedia_article_since_2_yrs_ago_been_put_on_NOINDEX_Category_? edit] but is ❌. Behavior is suggesting meatpuppetry.

is ✅ to Alizafar567 who is to the master. Indeffing these two. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I warned FabriceCanel. Closing. GABgab 03:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Their edit to Talk:Angelique Rockas is making the same request as the assumed sock / meat above: The page is using Template:NOINDEX generating  preventing indexing in Bing, Google... so suggesting removing this template--07:01, 16 October 2018. Compare Alizafar567's edit at the helpdesk, Why has Internationalist Theatre a main space Wikipedia article since 2 yrs ago been put on NOINDEX_ Category ?--14:03, 17 October 2018‎. —— SerialNumber  54129  15:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , sorry I was still filing when youwrote that! ——  SerialNumber  54129  15:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No worries. See above report. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Like all the other socks, this account's nigh-exclusive purpose is to add the Internationalist Theatre and Angelique Rockas to articles (and to tweak previous contributions of other accounts of this person). –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 21:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus:
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Reopening. Based on precedent and because some of these accounts have edited other projects, the four accounts should be globally locked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all, found some more socks on Meta and locked them too. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Reopening. Based on precedent and because some of these accounts have edited other projects, the four accounts should be globally locked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all, found some more socks on Meta and locked them too. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 * A bonus - thanks! Closing again. Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅

. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Marking 'close' per Berean Hunter. The SandDoctor  Talk 05:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, . — Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅


 * knew what she was doing when she tagged this sock creation at simple.wiki. Someone should promote her to steward. Another article there. I will put some information on the checkuser email list for you.


 * Another one at ga.wiki
 * Siberiantiger001 created ...at ru.wiki, see checkuser email list
 * There are other edits and creations at a few other wikis.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Global locks are being requested on the cu mailing list. All of these accounts have been here locally.
 * Thanks. Taking a look on simple. -DJSasso (talk) 12:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * All socks edits have been reverted, all socks blocked and tagged per CU evidence. Nothing left to do, so close. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 00:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 00:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

They're baaaaack! TBH I haven't been tracking why the edits are in themselves disruptive, but this is obviously the Angelique Rocka sock again, same edits as always. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 21:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given the recent history of sleepers found through CU checks and the amount of recent socking, a CU check is probably in order. I see behavioural evidence to link these accounts. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 02:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

✅

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  04:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Behavioral. 94 is already blocked, but not listed here. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 00:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Like the loads of other blocked accounts/IPs of this person, these IPs focus on promoting the Internationalist Theatre and Angelique Rockas, eg. . –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 22:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * No worries, thanks for reconsidering. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No response to the request for more info, plus most of these haven't edited in months, closing with no action taken. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * When I closed this, I didn't notice that Roscelese had indeed provided the requested information. Reopening.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * - Curt345, even with a single edit, is obvious, as is 82.1.219.198. 82 is clearly static, 2 month block.  I didn't look at the other IPs due to how long it is since they edited.  Given the history of sleeper checks finding large numbers of socks, asking for CU to confirm Curt and see what other life forms can be found under the rock.   again, my apologies for not noticing your response the first time. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No other accounts or sleepers that I can find. No comment with the relation to the account and any listed IP address here.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Curt . Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP 82 previously blocked continues to be active in spamming the Internationalist Theatre to articles. The other two likewise are single-interest accounts devoted to developing Internationalist Theatre and Theatro Technis on Wikipedia, including by adding these theatres' productions to articles on famous plays with screenshots of archival reviews, as the banned user did. The articles' history reveals other IPs that are also this person, but I haven't filed any IP that hasn't been active in the last month. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 13:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Volut is an obvious SPA, blocked and tagged. The IPs are amazing.  Looks like these are both long-term static addresses dedicated to this sort of abuse.  82.1.219.198 is apparently part of 82.1.219.0/24 allocated to "WESTMINSTER-CITY-COUNCIL".  195.191.67.225 also appears to be long-term static, and clearly operated by a savvy user, since their earliest edits are notes to various functionaries complaining about arbcom matters.  They both geolocate to London (as do all of the other IPs in the archives).  Blocked both for a year.  My usual rule on static IPs is to block them for as long as they've been a problem, but I can't bring myself to issue a 3-year block on an IP. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)