Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amirhossini/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All these editors have participated in Articles for deletion/Mohsen Soori and said "Keep". However, one can observe that: JIM.Artor appears to be an exception to my first evidence but not to the rest. So, I propose a checkuser should ascertain his status. In fact, since there are so many users already, a checkuser should scan for sleepers. It is always possible that one more has been created. Codename Lisa (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Most of them are actually created on 11 November 2016, the day that they appeared in said AfD and said "Keep". Most have negligible other contributions.
 * 2) The usernames themselves seem to have been created by the same person because they are two-part names separated by a "."
 * 3) Their userpages have similarities; it seem it is written by the same person. See how some of them mistakenly refer to Wikipedia as "wiki".
 * 4) Pay attention to the markedly poor English of all these editors and how they do not seem to know how to indent their comments. Compare with the sockmaster's messages in his user talk page and my user talk page.
 * 5) Finally, the sockmaster has declared to be Mohsen Soori himself:  So, basically, the sockmaster has written an article about himself and created socks to help keep the article from deletion.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅. Blocked and tagged. No other accounts seen. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)