Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amit Srivastava/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Appears to be a case of meat puppetry where the puppeteer made a claim that edits were being done at their bidding. We see that the editor attacks another editor templating them as having a religious bias and not assuming good faith. Similarly, the second editor also attacks editors claiming religious bias 2. I first discussed this with Liz who suggested I move it here if I have concerns. Source of conflict is this AFD. VV 04:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checked Amit Srivastava, no related accounts found. Leaving for behavioral check, since it seems there's an allegation of meatpuppetry. ST47 (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I am suspicious of this, but it could be explained as an accident. Other than that, I'm not seeing evidence of meatpuppetry, and I think the master's mention of "my users" was probably just a typo or English issue rather than a claim of meatpuppetry. Closing without action. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , FWIW, their timecards are different enough, I agree that they're unlikely to be the same person. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)