Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitahujapk/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Amitahujapk was blocked due to trolling after having been caught spamming the link prabhukedwar.in. A few days later, Amitkumar8055 was created and adding the same link.

Sample diffs:
 * Both accounts added the link to this article: Amitahujapk Amitkumar8055
 * Amitahujapk adding the link:
 * Amitkumar8055 adding the link:

On my talk page, Amitkumar8055 admits to having a COI, but denies being the same user. Due to the coincidence of timing, similarity in names, and adding the same link, it seems a little suspicious to me. Apparition11 Talk/ Contribs 13:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Thank you for outlining your concerns https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Apparition11. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia and would like to address the points you have raised.

Account Allegations: While I understand that the similarities between the accounts Amitahujapk and Amitkumar8055 might raise suspicions, I assure you that I am a distinct user. I acknowledge the coincidence in timing and naming, but I have not engaged in any form of trolling or malicious activity.

Conflict of Interest (COI): I admit to having a COI concerning the website prabhukedwar.in, which is why I have been transparent about my affiliation. My goal has always been to provide valuable and relevant information to the articles, not to spam or promote.

Please verify if I have repeatedly requested guidance, as our website is a legally registered devotional news site, and all our content is meticulously researched and based on accurate information.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Apparition11

This user has constantly accusing me of using ChatGPT: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Apparition11

Link Additions: I understand that repeatedly adding the same link can be perceived as spamming. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and am willing to follow any guidelines or recommendations you have to ensure my contributions are appropriate.

I am committed to working within Wikipedia's guidelines and would appreciate any guidance on how to proceed correctly. If there are specific steps I need to take to rectify this situation or if there are other ways I can contribute constructively, please let me know.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, to nobody's surprise. Given the persistent denial, the linkspam, and the use of LLM-generated posts after warnings, I'm indeffing. Closing. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)