Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amkgp/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've chosen to keep this quiet for a long time, but continued logged-out editing leaves me no choice. The following is not based on CU data, but solely on behaviour.Amkgp repeatedly edited logged out to point out WP:PERM backlogs whenever they had open rights requests: ;. They were warned and later blocked for this behaviour (cf. ). Following a permission revocation and public appeal, they were scrutinised at AN and subsequently retired. They continued to edit logged out and created (connection acknowledged here) as their (arguably un-)clean start account after I raised concerns about the legitimacy of this (, though my suggestion was that they log into their main account). They then proceeded to edit logged-out at AfD to vote !keep on an article that had been created by Run n Fly which was probably what led to an indefinite CU block on both Amkgp and Run n Fly. I am filing this because of their continued insistence on editing logged-out in projectspace to manipulate AfD discussions. There are many ducky tells showing that the continued projsocking is them, but I won't divulge details both to save time and per WP:BEANS, though I'm happy to email details to any interested parties if needed. The IP range they are on is too wide to be blockable (though if this continues, a partial block from the Wikipedia namespace should probably be considered), but I am filing this both to create a paper trail and to justify future reverts for block evasion. , closing. Please wait a day or so before archiving this. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Also noting for the record, though there's less activity on that one. There's a third range, but I forgot. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pro forma, see below. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
New ISP and new – similarly hard to block – range but clearly them, see. A rangeblock doesn't strike me as justifiable at this point, but temporary /64 blocks, as well as block evasion reverts should be considered for future activity on this range that can be attributed to Amkgp. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)