Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amryose16/Archive

Report date December 8 2009, 23:45 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Sole edits have been to revert the edits I made that revered Amryose16's edits. Unlikely either is the original sock, but no clear parent detected at the moment. Likely has other sleepers or actives from some of the edits seen on target articles, so requesting check user. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

– I just don't think CU will be able to come up with much anything else here. As you just said (which I agree), many of the other edits that go further back are from accounts that, 1) are IPs and 2) are stale. I'm not seeing really anything at all for other older registered accounts that would look suspicious here. MuZemike 23:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I briefly sifted through the histories of the articles edited by these two accounts, and I can't seem to find really any other registered account which a CU could bring attention to besides IPs or old stuff that CUs wouldn't be able to check. Do you have examples of past similar edits by other accounts or IPs that can help out here? MuZemike 23:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Sorry, didn't realize how old some of those other edits were. was one I was suspicious off, but didn't see any other cross over between beyond the film list. --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Both have been indefinitely blocked and tagged, respectively (by NuclearWarfare).  ceran  thor 03:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Report date January 16 2010, 17:07 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Another new account, similar to the last, doing nothing but restoring Amryose's edits. Requesting check user to check for sleepers, as this one had awhile to operation before detection. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 17:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 17:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

for checkuser on Wikiwacker2 and Amryose16. SpitfireTally-ho! 16:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Collectonian, it seems that Wikiwacker2 is not actually reinserting the edits made by Amryose16, but is rather going around removing references to Ice Age 4, please could you be more explicit as to why you are requesting checkuser? Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 14:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * He has the same focus on Blue Sky Studios and 20th Century Fox Animation as Amryose16. In checking further, I see he is not redoing Amryose16 edits, but continuing to "clean up" the Blue Sky list in a similar manner as Amryose16 and his other socks, including using no edit summaries, and just reverting anytime anyone undoes his edit. Amryose also showed the same interest in "accuracy" of Ice Age information in their earlier edits. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please could you provide a link/diff to where Amryose showed their "interest in "accuracy" of Ice Age information", if you can do such then I would probably be happy to endorse, depending on the link/diff. I'm going out now, but will check back in about 3/4 hours, regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 14:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I hadn't seen those Ice Age-related edits before. Having been persuaded to check, the result is actually . Dominic·t 15:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

unlikely sock, no action needed, SpitfireTally-ho! 18:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions