Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ana De Armani/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
UPE sock group, filed for the record. Chilli Chin and Ana De Armani have similar behaviour. Chin recreated Draft:Karen Salicath Jamali / Draft:Josh Guberman as Draft:Karen Salicath Jamali (2) / Draft:Josh Guberman (2). There are some older accounts that may be related but I suspect it's meatpuppetry instead. Spicy (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Tagged, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
UPE ring, same editing pattern of sandbox{n}. cc — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Now blocked by Bbb23, along with . Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Boolana was blocked for COI issues on 26 October 2023. One such issue was the page Draft:Business Property Trust. Titio99 created the page Business Property Trust (business), which is almost identical to the page Boolana created. The page is not historically tied to Boolana's page.

Further, although it's not definite proof, looking at Boolana's contributions, it seems like they tended to create multiple drafts per day, each taking about 15 minutes. They do not include edit summaries. Titio99 similarly has created several articles in one day, each approximately 15-30 minutes apart. They do not include edit summaries.

Other than Business Property Trust, they do not appear to have created/edited articles with the same subject, though. However, both editors tend to create pages for entrepreneurs. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These are ✅:


 * BheekAam was blocked without CU as a sock of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Ana De Armani. The historical data in that case is not of much use but it looks likely based on behaviour. Spicy (talk) 23:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Group 2 via Titio99, internally ✅ and to the above:


 * Group 3 via Terrylano, proxy use or somesuch but internally ✅ and behaviourally ducky:


 * Group 4 via Wawahoa, ditto:


 * I also checked  due to overlap with Psyched20 at Special:PageHistory/Draft:Nicolas Bijan and their editing pattern. That one's  due to proxy use but behaviour is enough for me to block.
 * The ranges these accounts are on are really spammy and there are possible links to a number of UPE cases. You could spend hours going down this rabbit hole. However, Ana De Armani seems like a good enough fit for now. Spicy (talk) 00:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts. - please merge to Ana De Armani and tag. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅. Tagging as proven and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)