Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ana Sušac/Archive

08 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Koroknait has a very similar editing style as blocked User:Ana Sušac: POV editing of influential Chinese communists (particularly Li Xiannian), apparently not using the preview button and taking a ton of edits to change relatively little, and image uploads (I haven't checked for licensing issues yet). Most telling is that besides editing Chinese leaders, both accounts also edited Ivo Josipović. Seems like block evasion.--Atlan (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Atlan (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Hi Atlan, will you please provide some diffs to specific edits that show an overlap in editing? Thanks, Tiptoety  talk 17:53, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hard to pick specific diffs because of their sloppy editing, but compare to . The additions are quite different (Koroknait has made a lot more changes), but the style overlaps. Both accounts attempt the elevate the importance of Li Xiannian by introducing praise and peacock terms to the text. Both accounts also change the lead image and add more images they themselves have uploaded. Also, their comments show the same limited English language skills and their obsession with the Chinese leadership,  and . Lastly, the Koroknait account was opened after the Ana Susac account was blocked.--Atlan (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. From a technical standpoint, they appear highly . Tiptoety  talk 21:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Diffs were helpful, thank you :) Blocked and tagged, notifying commons. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  15:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

11 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK, this is just paperwork. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  14:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  14:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

12 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

And yet another sock. As soon as was blocked,  appeared. As soon as that sock was blocked, appeared and picked up with the same POV-pushing editing on the same articles (specifically here and  and ). Grammatical errors are consistent with the rest of this sock family. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅,  TN X Man  19:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

14 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Having been blocked on four different registered usernames, the sockmaster has apparently decided to edit anonymously, with similar edits here and here, with blanking of talk page notes about the neutrality of the sock's edits, and with complaints on both my talk page (here) and on User Atlan's talk page (here) (Atlan is another editor who has been keeping an eye on this sock family's POV pushing.) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I've added a few more IP's used recently. Is a range block a possibility? The rate at which they change IP addresses makes blocking any single one pointless.--Atlan (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Relevant IPs blocked The  Helpful  One  23:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That is, . T. Canens (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

03 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Exact same edits as Ana Sušac on Li Xiannian‎ article, user is also using IP's to edit war. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't think a checkuser is necessary. The IP's are from the same range that was previously rangeblocked. That TaoKing account is such an obvious duck that it can just be blocked on behavioral evidence. See here, where the IP edits a comment made by TaoKing. They aren't very proficient at logging in and out to switch identities. All the accounts and IP's keep reverting to the same edits made by Ana Susac back in February, and have been reverted some 50 times now. They will not get the point. Please rangeblock once more.--Atlan (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, also found . . WilliamH (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  05:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)