Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anarcocapitalista1981/Archive

24 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Others who may have more expertise assessing this situation might be, or. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Compare edit summaries, both using word "vandalizing" in their edit summaries to refer to removal of info pertaining to a particular POV:
 * 2) * = "I don't know why Cwobeel keeps vandalizing and breaking the wikipedia neutrality..."
 * 3) * = "See talk page and stop vandalizing sourced information."
 * 4) Both appear to be WP:SPAs, with first edit ever to same exact page:
 * 5) * = Undid revision 682558017 by Wtmitchell
 * 6) * = "Replaced poorly worded and inappropriate language about Vaultz pencil box with sourced mention, minus the inappropriate tone/editorializing. Reverted last poorly worded edit.)"
 * 7) Both post to same exact subsections on same article talk page, making it appear to be more users, in direct violation of WP:SOCK:
 * 8) * = DIFF
 * 9) * = "And I repeat..."
 * , compare with, posting to exact same section about same issue: DIFF.
 * , DIFF.
 * , with DIFF.
 * , with DIFF.
 * Added another one, with diff evidence. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * One more, with diff evidence,, DIFF. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Another one,, with DIFF. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * And yet another one,, with DIFF. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've declined the CU request. We almost never publicly disclose the IP address of a named account per the privacy policy.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries. There's enough strong evidence above to evaluate based on behavioral evidence. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * . Please, block 106.187.88.122 and the master for three days each.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocking master and both IPs (the second as precautionary in case he still has access to that IP) for 72 hours and closing.

Added the above three (3) more. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * , DIFF.
 * , with DIFF.
 * , with DIFF.
 * Perhaps with the new information, might require a few rangeblocks? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Reopening case in light of new evidence presented. It may take me a short while before I can review.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocking remaining IPs for 72 hours and I've semi-protected the article for 2 weeks. Closing.