Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anarul Islam(Rony)/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All WP:SPA users creating article on same subject Rudraksh Cap-Tech. One of the user is already blocked and the IP's removed the speedy template from Rudraksh Cap-Tech earlier. The titles (Rudraksh Cap-Tech and Rudraksh Cap-Tech Ltd) are currently protected against recreation but user Gaumata444 recreated it under a different title as Rudraksh Cap-Tech Limited and user Jutamarum created an article for the founder of the same company. GSS (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please compare the named accounts - they are all promoting the same company and its personnel. GABgab 21:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, due to a couple of factors, CU will not be useful for finding sleepers or other related accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * - Please block all the confirmed accounts indefinitely. Please use your own discretion as to whether to block Gaumata444. Thanks, GABgab 23:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked all accounts (based on deleted contributions I"m comfortable with a block on Gaumata444). Two accounts (Gulikha and Jutamarum) I had blocked (way before any SPI) as advert socks and had tagged Jutamarum as a sock of Gulikha. Please also see and decide how you want to tag all of these. I've left all these SPI blocks untagged, just referred the SPI in the block log. I'm closing as this now needs either CU or clerk guidance on tagging and then archiving. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, due to a couple of factors, CU will not be useful for finding sleepers or other related accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * - Please block all the confirmed accounts indefinitely. Please use your own discretion as to whether to block Gaumata444. Thanks, GABgab 23:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked all accounts (based on deleted contributions I"m comfortable with a block on Gaumata444). Two accounts (Gulikha and Jutamarum) I had blocked (way before any SPI) as advert socks and had tagged Jutamarum as a sock of Gulikha. Please also see and decide how you want to tag all of these. I've left all these SPI blocks untagged, just referred the SPI in the block log. I'm closing as this now needs either CU or clerk guidance on tagging and then archiving. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, due to a couple of factors, CU will not be useful for finding sleepers or other related accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * - Please block all the confirmed accounts indefinitely. Please use your own discretion as to whether to block Gaumata444. Thanks, GABgab 23:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked all accounts (based on deleted contributions I"m comfortable with a block on Gaumata444). Two accounts (Gulikha and Jutamarum) I had blocked (way before any SPI) as advert socks and had tagged Jutamarum as a sock of Gulikha. Please also see and decide how you want to tag all of these. I've left all these SPI blocks untagged, just referred the SPI in the block log. I'm closing as this now needs either CU or clerk guidance on tagging and then archiving. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreation of Rudraksh Cap- Tech Limited (added space after hyphen) and Anirudh sethi (using lowercase in Surname) to trick NPP's same as other socks. GSS (talk) 10:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * : Did show up on your October 10 check? Thanks,  GABgab 00:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, they did, but since they're using a completely different device, I didn't take notice of them. They're editing from a couple of the same ranges as the socks above, but are technically unrelated. Anarul Islam(Rony) is a ✅ match to . I'll leave it to another admin or admin clerk to determine whether they're the same as this master, or whether they're related to another promotional sockfarm. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Either way, the behavior is a lock, and - sadly - . Please block both. Thanks, GABgab 13:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Anarul Islam(Rony) is older than the account currently designated as the master. You may wish to check the previously confirmed socks to see if any are older still before moving. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Moved and retagged. GABgab 18:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)