Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anasaitis/Archive

12 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Anasaitis and I have a dispute about the content of the Iraqi Civil War infobox-template that is used in the Iraqi Civil War (2014–present)-article. He/she have been changing from three to two columns, while I have changed from two to three columns (separat column for the Kurds). Ref.:



There is also a discussion here: Talk:Iraqi_Civil_War_(2014–present), and I have warn him of discretionary sanctions here: User_talk:Anasaitis

When no consensus could be reached for a change to "Anasaitis version", Raskolnikov6 showed up to support him/here. Ref. diff

Raskolnikov6, have only made 6 edits to WP, and have been active for less than 2 hours. Based on Anasaitis edit warring and that he/she needed support on the talk-page to change it, I suspect that Raskolnikov6 and Anasaitis are the same user. Erlbaeko (talk) 08:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am not the same user. I am somewhat new to editing Wikipedia and was reading the talk page for discussion on another page I was editing and found this dicussion and decided to concur.

Just because someone else disagrees with you doesn't mean they are the same person. feel free to check my ip or whatever. Raskolnikov6 (talk) 19:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I am outraged by this accusation. I don't even know who Raskolinikov6 is. I am glad that he agrees with me, but I am not him. As for you, Eribaeko, I cannot believe you. I did exactly what you asked, even after I explained to you why I don't like to argue with other users. I explained my views on the matter at hand plainly, and listened to your response. I told you why I disagreed with your views, and I then waited for your response. After a while, you stopped responding. I waited for days, but you didn't respond. It has now been over a week since you last responded to my comments on the talk page. I fail to see how we can come to an agreement and reach a consensus about the article if you won't respond to my statements. I gave you plenty of time to respond to my arguements, and you didn't, and now you respond by accusing me of sockpuppetry just because someone actually agreed with me. It's starting to look like you are trying to get rid of me just because I don't agree with you. I am not Raskoliikov6. I can barely spell his name! I have been active on this site for a while now, and while my record may not be perfect, this is the first time that I have been accused of sockpuppetry. Why on earth would I suddenly decide to risk being permanently banned by doing something as stupid as this?! Anasaitis (talk) 19:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've declined the CU request. One edit is simply insufficient to warrant a CU, particularly when the filer is one of the parties involved in the dispute. I'm tempted to decline the case completely, and I will do so unless a clerk sees merit in it or more evidence is presented.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * . Y'all can take this content dispute back to the trenches. BTW, Raskolnikov is a literary character from Crime and Punishment. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)