Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndrewLuckie/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both are SPAs on Isobar (company). Let me know if you want diffs, but it's DUCK, and the editcompare will show it. Per the COIN discussion, the master is apparently an employee, and has ignored several COI warnings. Donald is likely a sleeper account - the account was created almost a month ago, first edit was yesterday, on Isobar, and that's all he has edited, so if nothing else the AfD rationale is remarkably coherent for a new user. CU requested, as if there's one, there may be others. MSJapan (talk) 04:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I am a University student. My class assignment was to pick an article in danger of deletion and improve the article. All I did was add a couple of references or citations to the article. Is that not allowed? I am working on an improved version of the article to help improve the scope of coverage about notable companies or corporations. I thought that was the goal of Wikipedia. Perhaps it is not. Please explain all this to me. Donald1659 (talk) 07:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If it is not a problem, would you let us know which university and module is this? As far as I recall, I have never come across similar assignments before. (PS - I was about to launch an SPI myself when I saw it was already created). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm going to request that this case remain open until such time as the existence of the assignment is verified by the professor to the proper channels. DGG has made a request to that effect.  However, the edit summary here is troubling from a "new editor", especially since it's a Twinkle edit.  A bit too WP:OWNy for an new editor who's simply "taking a class", and taking a class doesn't explain why the account is almost a month old. MSJapan (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm, that reminds me . Another editor had asked us both about a class assignment and they had also shown a bit of OWNy behaviour. I now realise that they hadn't clarified anything later. Is it possible that they are from the same school? I'm wondering if it would be worth verifying. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I added one more just in case. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The accounts are ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC)