Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewttnguyen/Archive

30 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I came across the user page for User:AACI's Low Income Resource, which listed a bunch of numbers and addresses for various places that help low income people. I then noticed that an open AfD for Low Income Resources had the exact same type of data. The user who made the page, User:Andrewttnguyen, also has the information at his userpage- which I've tagged as a promotional userpage. While I do think that it's noble that someone wants to help low income people, this is pretty much promotion and not what Wikipedia is for. I'm concerned that these two are socks or meatpuppets for one group and I'd like to have a check done for any sleeper accounts. I'm not sure where to put, but I think that the "yes" part takes care of that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm sure they are related, but that doesn't appear to be the kind of editor to create sleeper accounts? Linksearch suggests that there are no other user pages with that material. I don't think CheckUser is called for, and would expect it's sufficient to educate them about our policies regarding promotion/conflict of interest/alternate or role accounts. Amalthea 17:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing without action per Amalthea's comments. I've left a brief warning about multiple accounts on Andrew's page as well. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)