Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndriiKhmelkov/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of Numista previously created by BrianTheInternetSurfer who also uploaded File:Logo of Numista.png. Robert.stefan.m first with a comment that stop removing the page, it's the biggest coin collecting catalogue available out there and. GSS (talk |c|em ) 10:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Adding Seldnis whose last edit was in February logged in today to add a source at Numista which is ok but his way of adding an internal link in talk discussions e.g. Articles_for_deletion/Example (underscore) and the use of double hyphen before signing a comment is exactly same as AndriiKhmelkov please see and. GSS (talk |c|em ) 10:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Update: I just notice user (profile on numista.com) recently left  which reads Are you by any chance SquareRootLolly? Anyhow we could still save the Numista article if... and then BrianTheInternetSurfer immediately removed this message. I found this discussion on en.numista.com/forum titled "Numista on Wikipedia" where I found SquareRootLolly was the creator of the previous version which was created by BrianTheInternetSurfer on Wikipedia, then recreated by another person who known as AndriiKhmelkov here on Wikipedia and now they are discussing how to save the article from deletion here and here also it should be noted that user AndriiKhmelkov, Robert.stefan.m and Seldnis all made their last edit the same day and same time. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 05:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * to disclose his relationship with the company, but without answering my query, from his talk page which is a sign of bad faith editing. Thank you. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 10:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Update: This is funny but expected, after their article Numista gets deleted, BrianTheInternetSurfer nominated one of my articles for deletion with a edit summary also there are some new comments at  en.numista.com/forum (please see here and here). Thank you. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 06:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Comments-This is meat-puppetry (a bunch of forum members trying to save their article)and a CU check would obviously find them unrelated:) Whether this's block-able or we shall assume AGF, (I incline to the latter) is better left to discretion of closing-admin. &#x222F; WBG converse 06:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The involvement of a long-existing, but mostly dormant account (Seldnis) strongly suggests a sleeper, so a CU should check for more sleepers in addition to doing a plain CU check. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 20:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Closing without action. Sro23 (talk) 04:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)