Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angel and the flock/Archive

04 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both have similar usernames, and both are using Wikipedia as a social network in similar ways. Gparyani (talk) 03:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
See below for all results. Risker (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

07 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same style of userpage as the previous two users. Same bad grammar as the other users. Also, userpage mentions "angel flock" which clearly implies that this is a sock puppet. Gparyani (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser comments: Results for these two reports are combined. The following are ✅ socks:
 * Note: When addressing these accounts, please include review of the content of the edits. In some cases, requests for suppression may be appropriate.  Most, particularly on user talk pages of long-dormant accounts, may simply best be reverted.  Risker (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts, which might be for the best of the user. Edits of concern have been taken care of. Mike V • Talk 19:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: When addressing these accounts, please include review of the content of the edits. In some cases, requests for suppression may be appropriate.  Most, particularly on user talk pages of long-dormant accounts, may simply best be reverted.  Risker (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts, which might be for the best of the user. Edits of concern have been taken care of. Mike V • Talk 19:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts, which might be for the best of the user. Edits of concern have been taken care of. Mike V • Talk 19:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)