Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AngieWattsFan/Archive

31 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block evading sock has taken up the same reversions at articles Roxy Mitchell and Alfie Moon. A view of the articles' history will show the clear pattern. WP:DUCKTEST ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   22:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked, master block extended, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

13 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account has made a single edit which was to reinstate an edit made previously on dozens of occasions by the puppeteer. The user was created immediately after AngieWattsFan was blocked indefinitely. WP:DUCKTEST.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  23:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)  Flat Out   let's discuss it  23:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Add IP that has now made the same edit on all 3 articles.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  01:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Ponyo, Three new edits, reinstating the same information on the same three articles. 1 2 3.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  00:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's certainly that this is AngieWattsFan editing via a mobile device, but with just a single edit it's hard to make any solid determination.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  00:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Ponyo I have added an IP that needs a review.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  01:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Given you've blocked the IP, what's the go with this case? Is it still waiting a behavioural investigation to confirm the possible result? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also might be worth another check given this. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the follow-up note. The additional edits on the account show that is a ✅ sock.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  15:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks Ponyo, now tagged as confirmed. Closing now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)