Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ankit G Dubey/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The master was earlier blocked for a week for using multiple accounts but in his unblock request, he declined any connection with Apostle Samsoin and Adam Sir Jr. but as per his real name is Ankit Dubey. Apostle Samsoin also created Aj white jr.'s userpage who's username is very similar to already blokced user I notice Aj white jr. using mobile device since he was registered and posted master's article Draft:Kratika Mathur(Model) in mainspace under Kratika Mathur (model) and the use of edit summary is exactly same as other two. GSS (talk |c|em ) 14:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Would you like to address this report?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I ran a CU on Aj white jr. a few months ago based on this discussion, and he was . I didn't block him then, but there's just too much crossover between Aj white jr. and Ankit G Dubey to ignore.  I'll block this time. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar username as previous sock "Aj white jr.", editing in the same area, submitted master's draft Draft:Niranjan Bharti (Director) for a review and creating the same kind of promotional drafts on non-notable people related to the Indian film industry. There are a number of similarities but I don't want to spill the beans so requesting CU and pinging. Thank you. GSS (talk |c|em ) 13:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yeah, I'm pretty sure I see what GSS is talking about, and I blocked the new account. Everything I know of is stale, but there were several active socks last time I looked, so I ran a check anyway.  I don't see anything incredibly obvious. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Definitely the same person and recreated Draft:Rebecca Anand. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The case is, and if the socking is that obvious, a CU is also unnecessary. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm convinced, looking at the draft. Blocked/tagged.  Had a poke around for sleepers, found nothing. Case closed. Courcelles (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)