Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ankur Mazumder/Archive

05 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The usernames are very much similar, and both of them are doing similar things. After the sockmaster was blocked for being a vandalism-only account, this sock stepped in and recreated his deleted userpage. Gparyani (talk) 06:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Master already blocked. Sock blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

05 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Caught these additional accounts after my initial report above. Just after my nominating the sockmaster's userpage for deletion, the first IP steps in and removes the CSD template. After checking its contributions, I discovered edits to the registered user's userpage, and the user was abusing his userpage in the same way as the sockmaster and the above sockpuppet. Finally, looking at the history of that page, I find the second IP, who has added substantial content to that page. Gparyani (talk) 06:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I have added 168.235.196.116 which has also been plugging Ankur Mazumder. JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Account blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. No action on the IPs unless they do any more - I'll watch them for a day or so. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

05 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Re-created the deleted User:Saheb Mazumder page and posted the same on User:Ankur Mazumder,saheb. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Added loudly-quacking "Ankur invent the Android Lollipop C+ Concepet" JohnCD (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Both blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

05 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Account is already blocked for a different reason, but based on its previous behavior, it seems like another sock. Reporting here for the record. Also requesting CU to weed out any additional accounts as I seem to be finding a lot of related accounts (see CU note below). Gparyani (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Well spotted, Gparyani! I don't know how my search missed that one.

Note to clerk - can we move the SPI to this name (Ankur Mazumder)? It is the oldest account, and the actual name of the sockpuppetteer. JohnCD (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Could you please see to my request for CheckUser above? I want to see if there are any more accounts that haven't been found yet. Gparyani (talk) 16:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm not a checkuser. we'll have to wait till one of them gets round to this. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note to Checkuser: there have been a lot of edits to do with Ankur Mazumder from the range 168.235.196.0/24. On a quick check I have found them from 114, 116, 120, 124, 126, 132, 136, 138, 140, 178, 182, 242, 246. I considered a short range-block, and if the nuisance persists I would be inclined to do that, but there are also a number of non-vandal edits from this range. Comments welcome. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

07 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same self-promotional user page. JohnCD (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

08 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sleeper account (inactive since February 4). Same username as one of the other socks, including the spelling mistake. Gparyani (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Another DUCK, well spotted. Blocked. JohnCD (talk) 10:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've ran a quick search of all of the keywords found in the usernames and everything I found was already blocked. I don't think we need a check right now, as the behavior has been very obvious. Mike V • Talk 02:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

18 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same old autobio JohnCD (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. Reported for the record. JohnCD (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

18 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Added link to Ankur Mazumder on Hooghly Collegiate School. In the same range as 168.235.196.126 from earlier. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The IP seems to have stopped, but I've semi-protected the affected page for 2 weeks. Mike V • Talk 21:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

22 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Already blocked as a suspected sock, but reporting here for the record. Gparyani (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

24 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sleeper account with very similar username as another sock. Please see deleted contribs. Gparyani (talk) 19:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Admin needed to check deleted edits.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Tough to say. This guys got only one edit (albeit deleted), and while the gist of the edit was somewhat similar to the sockmasters 1st deleted edit there is insufficient evidence at the moment to use as comparison for proof of socking. At best its a smarter sock, at worst some poor fool who made the wrong edit, and in either case I'd say it'd be a coin toss as to whether it'd be worth it to proceed. Sorry, but thats the best I can do. Perhaps a second opinion may help. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * During this time, I've also discovered another sock; could you please look at the case below? Gparyani (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I think it's just a child who happens to have a similar name. The content and style are quite different from all the others. I'll watchlist the talk page in case he comes alive again, but I suggest no other action needed. JohnCD (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Right now, I've marked this case as "on hold" given that we're waiting for him to become active. If he does nothing within a week, I'll mark it as closed and we'll leave it unblocked. OK? Gparyani (talk) 17:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I think we can close it now - I'm 99% sure it isn't him, if it is and he was going to use it he would have done so by now, and if it does spring to life his contributions are easily detected anyway. JohnCD (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

27 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same username and same self-promotional userpage. Gparyani (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, empirically linked to the already blocked User:Ankur Mazumder (Computer Expart). TomStar81 (Talk) 01:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you want to revision delete the first revision to the userpage? It's promotional and (I think) meets CSD U5 and/or G11. The later revisions are for the sockpuppetry tag, so those don't need to go. Gparyani (talk) 04:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Good point. Done. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

3 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Editor interaction utility

EVIDENCE is DUCK. His userpage states "...Ankur Mazumder (born 1997, is an Indian computer scientist..." Already blocked by me just now. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The account is blocked and tagged. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

10 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

More of the same. IP recreated it on the blocked user's user page.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
User already blocked by Tokyogirl79, reported for the record. IP blocked 3 days. JohnCD (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

15 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Again, added a reference to Ankur Mazumder on an article where one had been previously removed. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
IP blocked 3 days. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

16 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same name, same self-promotional userpage bio...another loudly quacking WP:DUCK!!! Gparyani (talk) 01:36, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Same person indeed. Userpage deleted and user blocked by me just now. Remains untagged. Thank you Gparyani. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Tagged him. Thanks for the swift block! (I also discovered two IPs making edits to the old page...could you also tag them?) Gparyani (talk) 01:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Old page? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The userpage that you deleted. Gparyani (talk) 01:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I see. He's using a dynamic IP so unless he's editing right now, I think blocking is a waste of time. A clerk here may be able to comment on a range block's collateral damage. I know little about that stuff. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Closing now. New case on IPs is opened.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

16 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Added reference to Ankur Mazumder on Hooghly Collegiate School. Gparyani (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: The page has now been pending-changes protected for three months to help prevent the persistent insertion of the reference to Ankur Mazumder into this article by socks of this user. However, the page should continue to be watched for this, because it is possible that the change may be accepted by a reviewer oblivious to this SPI. If that happens, the protection needs to be upgraded to semi. Gparyani (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added it to my watchlist. Let's hope others do to. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * And I to mine. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
(See: ). Admin needed to block.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * IP blocked thre days. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

17 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

And just after his last sock is blocked, he strikes again! Yet another WP:DUCK, acting almost exactly like the last sock! Gparyani (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It would also be great if an admin could write an abuse filter to deal with this, as this sockmaster's edits appear to be very similar. If his sockfarm gets too large (50-100+ socks), I'm going to file a WP:LTA case. Should I? Gparyani (talk) 17:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * This one is intense, but it hasn't been going on all that long yet, and may well burn out. I would consider an LTA if it's still going after 3 months and 50 socks, though an LTA doesn't actually help, it just provides a reference point. The place to ask for an edit filter is Edit filter/Requested, but again, I'm not sure - a filter adds a small overhead to every single edit, and is relatively easy to evade by the sort of spelling variations he has been using already. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
(see: ).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * and to me. Blocked and tagged. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

02 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK Creating page about self at User:Ankur Mazumder (INDIA) Phantom Tech  (talk) 07:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK, marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You may want to check User:ThePhantomBot/log for "LTA-4" to check for more socks. Basically, it's a bot that attempts to detect this automatically. Remember my previous request for an edit filter? Gparyani (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

03 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Possible WP:DUCK. Please see deleted contributions. Gparyani (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Not possible -- certain. Blocked by me just now but not tagged. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing. Mike V • Talk 02:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

08 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK diff Phantom Tech  (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Adding text about Ankur Mazumder diff. Admin needed to block the IP for a few days.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * IP blocked for 72 hrs. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

08 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK Gparyani (talk) 17:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Ankur Mazumder(Computer Field) blocked by me just now but not tagged. Userpage deleted. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Tagged by me. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

15 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreated content on User:Ankur Mazumder(Computer Field). May not need a block as stale for five days, but reporting for the record. Gparyani (talk) 23:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yes, the IP is stale, closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

17 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Old, stale account, but reporting for the record. May or may not need a block. Gparyani (talk) 02:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged, for completeness. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * To help find more socks, an edit filter has been written. You may check its logs here. Gparyani (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I'll add that to my list of things-to-check. JohnCD (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

31 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Even after a five-week hiatus, this operation seems to continue. All of the above accounts were caught by the edit filter created to catch sockpuppets of this user (see links at top of page). Though it's been a while since they have edited, they may rise again after a long hiatus (as what happened; see the edit filter logs). Therefore, they should be blocked, and also for completeness's sake. Gparyani (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The four named puppets are ✅ from one another. Blocked and tagged. The IP is too old to be worth blocking. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

25 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Caught by the edit filter. Checking the details reveals that he is the same person trying to create the same autobiography.

Also, another little oddity: he's finally learned about not promoting himself on Wikipedia, but he is still trying to promote his alternative outlet:.

An IP address was caught by the filter a while ago, but I didn't report it because from its contributions, it appeared to be that of an Internet café, shared IP, or open proxy IP. Gparyani (talk) 16:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

In addition, one of the formerly blocked socks is using Commons to bypass the block. See. Gparyani (talk) 17:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Account blocked and tagged, Commons pic nominated for deletion. I agree no point blocking the IP. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

11 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK. Edit filter logs show clearly that he is the same person trying to promote the same website as the last sock did. Also seems to be (unsuccessfully) trying to bypass by not including "Ankur Mazumder" in his username. Gparyani (talk) 06:44, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked as a duck. Sam Walton (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

03 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Attempt to promote Ankur Mazumder: Edit filter log entry Gparyani (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's been over a week since this case was filed; I'm going to go ahead and withdraw & close my own case as it's no use taking action against the IP. In fact, it might be a dynamic IP, based on the contribution history. Gparyani (talk) 04:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

07 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edits blocked by edit filter, along with diff, attempt to add "I am Ankur Mazumder" to the pages, making this a confession. Can someone please modify the filter to also check user talk space too? Gparyani (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP not active in the last 7 days. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

18 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Special:AbuseLog/13391698. This, among others, is one of his favorite topics. Waiting long periods of time (5-6 weeks) before trying to post on Wikipedia is one of his known behaviors, too. Gparyani (talk) 21:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
It's certainly him again, but this attempt is not enough to justify a long block, and given his usual habits a short block would have no effect. We'll just have to go on playing whack-a-mole. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

26 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user is recreating the same autobiography as was previously deleted under their other accounts, but under a slightly different name.


 * Ankur Mazumder
 * Ankur Mazumder (Poet)
 * Ankur Mazumder (writer) (Most recent)

Judging by the length of the archives here, this isn't their first rodeo. ~ Erick Shepherd  • ( Talk ) • 15:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

28 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created Ankur Mazumder ( Indian Author). JohnCD (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. Marking for close. JohnCD (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quacking after an absence--these socks created Draft:Ankur Mazumder (author) and Draft:Ankur Mazumder (West Bengal)‎ respectively. --Finngall talk 21:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - . Please block both socks indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:06, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Two socks blocked indef. EdJohnston (talk) 22:42, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Marking for close because there doesn't seem anything more to do. EdJohnston (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)