Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ann Heneghan II/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

As some of you may know,since at least late november,a user by the name of Ann Heneghan II (Which in itself is a possible impersonation of the real Ann Heneghan,which has been frequently harassed by JarlaxleArtemis)) has been repeatedly replacing content on Pauline Hanson's One Nation with unsourced material about them being "Authoritarian,Neo-Nazi,Fascist,Homophobic",etc,and has also made an personal attack on both User: RickinBaltimore and User:Favonian,wrongfully accusing them of allegedly having a affair with Pauline and for trying to "shut her down". What led to their block and eventual sockpuppetry was a legal threat and a attempt at "outing",by threatening to sue Wikimedia for one of their admins participating in rightwing movements,as evidenced here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ann_Heneghan_II&oldid=814747376. They then created the account Ann Coulter IV,just to re-insert the same sentence and remark that they are financed by the bilderberg group and that "Ann" is a lawyer at goldberg. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAnn_Heneghan_II&type=revision&diff=814747376&oldid=813114839. It was immediately reverted and blocked,but then they did it AGAIN,this time as Anne Frank VI. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ann_Heneghan_II&diff=next&oldid=813114962. And not too long after that,i came across another sockpuppet,this time aptly named Pope Anne Heneghan XVI. Using the same formula of increasing roman numerals after their names. This account didnt yet make any disruptive edits,but it is a potentially risky and volatile account who can attack anytime. That is why i request all three to be tagged as sockpuppets and blocked accordingly,and a checkuser to find out from what IP are they coming from and block that too,to prevent further abuse. Thank you for your time. And my apologies for the extensive evidence file,as this case is quite complicated. Aragorn II Elessar (talk) 18:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I was involved with the block on the main account, and this is quite obviously a duck screaming into a megaphone. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * If it's not AH II, then it's one of our perennial pests who, lacking a personality of their own, imitate others. Either way: blocked; closing. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)