Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anna Comnena/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The only edits made by this account have been the submission of Draft:Agon Hamza. This draft was created at almost the same time as Agon Hamza, and the article is a proper superset of the draft. This may be sockpuppetry, or one account may be copying the other account's work. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - probably worth a look The SandDoctor  Talk 17:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 22:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Based on the technical evidence, is  to be .  ~TNT (she/they • talk) 22:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Not edited in over a month and with the technical evidence, I don't see any ongoing disruption. Closing as moot, but feel free to refile if disruption begins and there is strong behavioural evidence. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

There is something weird going on with Agon Hamza and Draft:Agon Hamza. They were submitted at the same time, and an SPI found that the technical evidence did not match. Now the draft was resubmitted by Awiniasurania324, which is useless because there is already an article. Aw324 appears to be trying to game permissions. Also, a new account, Theoretical Possum, has done nothing but make three edits to Agon Hamza. There is something going on, most likely a gaming of permissions. They may not be associated with Anna C but only with each other? Robert McClenon (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts ❌ from a technical standpoint. Could this be some kind of undisclosed paid promotional activity by multiple people around the globe either working together or, more likely, following the same shared script? Mz7 (talk) 01:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No one has edited in over a month. If they start editing again and are disruptive (including promotion) feel free to report them to the appropriate noticeboard. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)