Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Annakoppad/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

These socks were identified and CUed at the master's talk page, here. I asked at Talk:SPI about creating a case so that the sockfarm is findable via a search of SPI, and got a green light [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations&oldid=819368243#Creating_a_case? here]. Nothing to do but close and archive. Jytdog (talk) 00:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreated an article previously created by, using material from the deleted version. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 22:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Validictorian is ❌ to Annakoppad. However, the following accounts are ✅ to each other and to the socks at Sockpuppet investigations/Jasleen Ahluwalia:
 * The following accounts are technical matches but :
 * Note: among the many confirmed accounts, some of the articles/drafts created are much more professional than others.  I believe that some of the accounts in the confirmed group are older than Jasleen Ahluwalia.
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are technical matches but :
 * Note: among the many confirmed accounts, some of the articles/drafts created are much more professional than others.  I believe that some of the accounts in the confirmed group are older than Jasleen Ahluwalia.
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are technical matches but :
 * Note: among the many confirmed accounts, some of the articles/drafts created are much more professional than others.  I believe that some of the accounts in the confirmed group are older than Jasleen Ahluwalia.
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are technical matches but :
 * Note: among the many confirmed accounts, some of the articles/drafts created are much more professional than others.  I believe that some of the accounts in the confirmed group are older than Jasleen Ahluwalia.
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are technical matches but :
 * Note: among the many confirmed accounts, some of the articles/drafts created are much more professional than others.  I believe that some of the accounts in the confirmed group are older than Jasleen Ahluwalia.
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are technical matches but :
 * Note: among the many confirmed accounts, some of the articles/drafts created are much more professional than others.  I believe that some of the accounts in the confirmed group are older than Jasleen Ahluwalia.
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The accounts that needed behavioural evaluation have now not edited in over two months, so blocking would serve no purpose. I'm closing this. --Deskana (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Spiritualbanda has created Draft:Jay Hunter, which was moved to mainspace by Heart613tm and has since been moved back by Bearcat. That page has also been edited by ShaunMogul 45. And Acrimony (film) has been edited by both Heart613tm and ShaunMogul 45 also. Finally, Annakoppad has created Jay Hunter, which was moved to Draft:Jay Hunter (version 2) as I have requested at User talk:Anthony Appleyard. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
You've provided evidence connecting the three suspected puppets, but I don't see any evidence connecting them to the master or their socks.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have added additional evidence in Special:Diff/833149077. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The three accounts are ❌ to each other and to the master.
 * The following two accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Shaun 197244's last edit was on March 3, and ShaunMogul 45's first edit was on March 11. I invite others to express opinions whether either or both accounts should be sanctioned.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Kind of tempting, but not quite enough to convince me. Closing without action.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 03:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Shaun 197244's last edit was on March 3, and ShaunMogul 45's first edit was on March 11. I invite others to express opinions whether either or both accounts should be sanctioned.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Kind of tempting, but not quite enough to convince me. Closing without action.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 03:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)