Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anonbae/Archive

20 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See history of Luke Cutforth.

I have a suspicion that User:Ff wikiwrite is User:Blackfish12 but not the other accounts, but I decided to put them in the same SPI as they are all very interested in the same subject. Potential CU required for them two, but unsure. Requesting CU for this to see if this is sockpuppetry, or just insane meatpuppetry. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 17:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * There is certainly evidence to check for sockpuppetry, so I wouldn't regard it was fishing. The repetitive vandalism within a short time period by various newly created accounts and also IP addresses surely is something to suspect sockpuppetry, or just incredible meatpuppetry, which is why I asked for a CheckUser. I also did not see it necessary to copy out a list of diffs of vandalism - almost half of the article's history - but have done so anyway. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Article created by User:Ff wikiwrite on 20 October
 * User:Blackfish12 removes CSD notice on the same day


 * 86.27.113.137
 * 5.65.123.64
 * 78.147.16.73
 * 86.27.113.137
 * 78.147.16.73
 * Niamhislame
 * 86.27.113.137
 * author of article ignores these edits entirely, potentially showing sockpuppetry
 * 86.46.204.223
 * 95.146.92.46
 * IndiaJadexo
 * 86.4.83.70
 * 78.147.16.73
 * 88.108.199.77
 * Rachelneighbour
 * Angrymandeletinglukespagehowaboutno
 * Rachelneighbour
 * Fiuffytari
 * Angrymandeletinglukespagehowaboutno
 * 86.134.129.4
 * Anonbae
 * 80.176.228.46
 * Laurajparker666
 * Anonbae
 * 5.67.242.98
 * 86.134.129.4
 * Fiuffytar
 * MattsThirdTimeLucky
 * 105.184.177.53
 * 80.250.121.89
 * 139.190.153.230
 * Eimearrr
 * Jojojoseph97
 * Lukeisabumbutilovehim
 * Anonbae
 * Anonbae
 * ISEEYOULUKE
 * Smhcutforth
 * 2.97.211.165
 * Carleyisnteberg
 * Kaitieoooo
 * Poppunkcutforth
 * Troyler shipper11
 * 86.27.80.67
 * 86.27.80.67
 * Zeranimi
 * Danyulsmeth
 * Niamhislame
 * Laniexxx
 * Rachelneighbour
 * Niamhislame
 * Anonbae
 * LoveyourselfHAHAH
 * 86.27.80.67
 * Cosmicpanic
 * LoveyourselfHAHAH
 * Smhcutforth
 * Cosmicpanic
 * Notesandlit123
 * 80.176.228.46
 * 86.30.99.1
 * Page protected. It can be seen, from the many diffs above, that all of the IPs and accounts edit the article in a very short period of time, changing the name in the infobox and lead of the article, modifying the AfD template, editing with butt/bum-related vandalism, edits mentioning Emma Blackery, and similar childish edits. I will add more diffs (from after the article's protection) soon.
 * Thine Antique Pen (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Fangirl10111
 * MattsThirdTimeLucky
 * Zeranimi
 * Soph123456788
 * 194.144.33.128
 * 92.22.0.219
 * 92.22.0.219
 * Wowjeno
 * Wowjeno
 * Smhcutforth
 * Smhcutforth
 * 46.208.242.61
 * Cakeandcats
 * Mattyxhealy
 * Stayspontaneous
 * Miss-jessie-gal
 * Missemmakat
 * Page protected.
 * Thine Antique Pen (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No action based on CU. The Cutforth article is salted. It doesn't appear that any of the unblocked editors have disruptively edited since the end of the Cutforth article on October 20, although I haven't looked at the entire list as it's too long. If there is any continuing disruption, regardless of whether it's an SPI matter,, feel free to come directly to my talk page and link back to this SPI.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * . Please use diffs to establish clearly why do you believe sock puppetry is occurring. For a listing this large with little or no history of cases, I am expecting a lot more evidence. - Mailer Diablo 19:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That's a lot better. GIve me a while to investigate this case. - Mailer Diablo 00:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I would say the accounts are ❌. Perhaps some form of campaign elsewhere on the Internet. . - Mailer Diablo 01:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)