Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonystrikes/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Seems to have a habit of reverting my edits and disrupting discussions at RFD which I am involved in. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  13:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Please see undoing my edits, and one from the other ip  removing talk page comments. The sockmaster has made personal attacks on my user page (see, so I wondered if the incidents at RFD were related for they were clearly directed against me, although the IPs did not specifically personally attack me). Pardon me if I'm not getting this right for I am new to this. Thanks, -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 20:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm closing this for the lack of evidence. Provided diffs are not strong enough to prove sockpuppetry.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Both of the IPs seem to have a particular interest in unrecognised states. etc. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 21:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)