Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnthonyvanDuyn/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

's first edit is continuing an edit war. So, even if he/she is not 's sock, he/she could be 's sock, or someone else's sock. AnthonyvanDuyn edit warred at the same article and so tried to do Amoschinoz. Generally speaking, there are edit wars against 's edits at Esther, Ahasuerus, Haman, Mordechai and Vashti. GPinkerton's enemies usually push a literalist or fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible against the consensus of modern mainstream Bible scholars. Personally, I am not that bothered by Cobra137's edit as to revert it, but such shenanigans have to stop. Oh, yeah, it is not the first time I hear the WP:RS/AC of Bible scholars being called subjective. E.g. at. See also for AnthonyvanDuyn's claim that Wikipedia is participating in AstroTurfing by definition. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - While there is a potential they could be the same, I am not seeing enough to justify a check or a block. Using an IP, then logging in to rerevert is normal, and not a regular violation of the spirit of the sock policy. More evidence would be required that these two accounts are connected and that the older account was very particular about getting this version of the change in. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 19:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with Amanda that a single edit is not enough evidence to take any action on. If they continue to perform edits WP:ILLEGIT edits, please open a new case here.  Closing with no action taken. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)