Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anuchak/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

X027 added copyvio images which were removed and was disrespectful to other users, specifically he added copyright images to Érik Lamela and Harry Winks, now if you see what this guy wrote on my talk page just now I am 100% sure it's the same person socking. I did notify User:Bbb23 and User:Boing! said Zebedee, but I will try here. Govvy (talk) 11:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * It looks likely to me, but maybe a checkuser can confirm? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Particularly given the writing style, this is obvious enough to not require CU attention. . Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Between the similar writing styles (see comments on user pages before they were tagged), similar usernames, interest in Tottenham Hotspur and Harry Kane, and images, this looks pretty clear cut. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - With four accounts in ten days this is probably worth a check to see if there are any others. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * The following accounts are to the above and ✅ to one another:
 * The confirmed accounts in the first group are . TonyBallioni (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The two likely accounts are also clearly the same person. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * In applying a CheckUser block against, you reinstated their talk page access. You might want to turn that back off. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for letting me know. Fixed. Also just in case you didn’t know, non-CUs can remove TPA and email the block settings on a CU block if there is a good reason (read this as my letting you know for future reference since you’re an admin clerk, not my being pissy since tone can’t come across in text). TonyBallioni (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are to the above and ✅ to one another:
 * The confirmed accounts in the first group are . TonyBallioni (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The two likely accounts are also clearly the same person. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * In applying a CheckUser block against, you reinstated their talk page access. You might want to turn that back off. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for letting me know. Fixed. Also just in case you didn’t know, non-CUs can remove TPA and email the block settings on a CU block if there is a good reason (read this as my letting you know for future reference since you’re an admin clerk, not my being pissy since tone can’t come across in text). TonyBallioni (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The confirmed accounts in the first group are . TonyBallioni (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The two likely accounts are also clearly the same person. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * In applying a CheckUser block against, you reinstated their talk page access. You might want to turn that back off. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for letting me know. Fixed. Also just in case you didn’t know, non-CUs can remove TPA and email the block settings on a CU block if there is a good reason (read this as my letting you know for future reference since you’re an admin clerk, not my being pissy since tone can’t come across in text). TonyBallioni (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * In applying a CheckUser block against, you reinstated their talk page access. You might want to turn that back off. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for letting me know. Fixed. Also just in case you didn’t know, non-CUs can remove TPA and email the block settings on a CU block if there is a good reason (read this as my letting you know for future reference since you’re an admin clerk, not my being pissy since tone can’t come across in text). TonyBallioni (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I believe this is Anuchak following the same trolling pattern of visiting Tottenham Hotspur F.C. related articles, visiting the Teahouse which follows the same trolling pattern. (Pinging: ) Govvy (talk) 11:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Indeed, and the wikilove trolling is unambiguous. —— SerialNumber  54129  11:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * With the exception of one sleeper account, the others listed below are all already blocked. I am listing them for the recod and tagging.
 * ✅ plus:
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)