Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aquapess/Archive

16 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

judging from her username a single purpose account dedicated to promoting the Aquatic ape hypothesis was editwarring to insert some contested material. She was blocked 16.44pm. By 17.44 PM Somitcw suddenly decided to return to wikipedia after not having edited since 2008, to reinsert Aquapess edit and subsequently participate in the discussion arguing for including it. Strikes me as an auspiciously chosen moment to return to editing after a 7 year hiatus.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC) ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both accounts are ❌. Mike V • Talk 15:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I also see no behavioral similarities, aside from the similar points of view. I guess we'll chalk this up to coincidence unless new evidence appears. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)