Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arcangel21/Archive

Report date February 3 2009, 18:58 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

CU case at commons and CU case at es-wiki. Also, he did the same contributions on the same articles: uploading unfree files and copyvios. Probably they have to be blocked. Dferg T ES 18:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Dferg T ES


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Highly likely based upon edits. As such all accounts have been indef blocked. Tiptoety  talk 03:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Report date February 22 2009, 16:48 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets



Per previous checkuser case I suspect this IP is evading a block from all this old accounts involved in x-wiki socking and mass copyvios at es-wiki and commons. Regarding the contributions from the IP and those old account I think it's quite possible that this IP is an IP-sock. Dferg (w:en: - w:es:) 16:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Dferg (w:en: - w:es:)
 * Block log for Arcange21
 * Block log for Menqueen
 * Block log for Andrew010203


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Dferg (w:en: - w:es:) 16:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Please merge into Sockpuppet investigations/Arcangel21/Archive. -- Avi (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Technical and behavioral evidence indicate that it is likely that the following accounts are related: Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Arcangel21/Archive for relationship between earlier accounts.
 * Conclusions

-- Avi (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)