Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Archie a9/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See. The user is probably block evading and is currently using this IP address to edit. Baby miss fortune 13:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've declined the CU request. We don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * IP blocked for 1 year. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Archie a9 has two current blocks in him: an indefinite block for a reason I forgot, and a 1 year block for block evading his former block and for sockpuppetry. He used the IP address User:121.54.22.122 to edit while his main account is blocked.

Now, I discovered another IP contributing; a User:121.54.47.14. It is easily noticeable that both addresses have similarities. Another thing is if you compare the WHOIS results of the former IP (see here) and this IP (see above), you can see that both are exacty alike. So I may assume that both IP addresses are used by the same person and is being used by Archie a9 to evade his blocks. Baby miss fortune 08:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * User:Babymissfortune, I don't put that much stock in whois and stuff like that, and even if that were conclusive one way or another, it wouldn't tie an IP to a person--rather, to a place. Please present behavioral evidence. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * please block the IP for 1 week for block evasion. The IP has been used consistently to make minor stat updates to a wide range of international basketball articles, just like the master and the previously linked IP. However, it does appear to have been used by unrelated users recently. echoing what Drmies said above: we can't rely on WHOIS data alone for IP addresses, because all that tells us is that the IPs are located in the same general area, in this case one of the most densely populated areas in the world. We need to see evidence in the form of diffs or some similar description as to why the user or IP you're reporting is behaving the same way as the blocked user. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Katietalk 18:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This could be a WP:DUCK on the username or it could be just a coincidence. I do not have credible and clear evidences of this user being a sockpuppet, but the range of their contributions is nearly similar (Philippine/sport-related articles) and based on this user's initial contributions, it seems that he has used former account/s before by the way he edits. Baby miss fortune 12:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Stale. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No evidence provided. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC)