Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Argumentdebate/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

U:Argumentdebate blocked at 16:49, 21 Apr; U:Athiestsupporter registered @17:03. Immediately ploughs nto the octane-level 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings, re-inserting the same (diff, diff) POV-material that the AD account had made. CU requested due to the high level of editing and the number of anon's involved, although that's unsurprising for any article of this nature. But, I suppose, if a second account is to be made to evade a 31-hour block—why not a third or fourth, I guess? Cheers,  ——  SerialNumber  54129  17:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * On edit: adding whose style  seems curiously similar; or possibly symptomatic. Either way, their account was created four minutes after U:AS was blocked.  ——  SerialNumber  54129  18:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Cabayi (talk) 19:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * - Please confirm. Cabayi (talk) 19:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Mr Debater appears to be ❌ to the other two, who have already been blocked and tagged by . —DoRD (talk)​ 19:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing more to do. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Too fast for me. I've seen the same data has, but I'm blocking Mr Debater as a suspected sock. The problem is that Mr Debater and one of the other accounts are using proxies, but I would call Mr Debater / rather than unrelated. By contrast, Athiestsupporter is /. My block of Mr Debater takes into account, of course, the behavioral evidence.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)