Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arpierson1993/Archive

Report date April 5 2009, 15:51 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo
 * See Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Arpierson1993
 * IP keeps making same ancestry edits as blocked User:Arpierson1993, adding ancestry categories to BLP articles as well as adding unsourced ancestry to article content.
 * Examples: -  -  -  -  - and many more, all inline with edits made by Master Puppet and other related suspected socks. - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 15:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * per this edit, I think we can conclude that this IP address HAS been used by the blocked user in the past. Mayalld (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Mayalld (talk) 15:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 15:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Report date May 30 2009, 19:37 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

new account "AlysonBeGoode" admits being a sockpuppet on her userpage, and the userpage of the sockmaster Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Wuhwuzdat (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Not sure if a block is appropriate just yet--per WP:BLOCK, blocked users (as opposed to banned users) are allowed to make a clean start. However, given that she's admitted her past identity, I'm watching this one with a raised banhammer. Blueboy96 20:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Already blocked along with her other socks. She continues to do the same thing as before despite warnings.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 01:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Account has been indefinitely blocked by for continuing the same behaviour as previous socks. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 01:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Report date June 1 2009, 18:41 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

another sock, same behavior as the last one Wuhwuzdat (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Wuhwuzdat (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Indefinitely blocked. Although, she's "attempting" to add sources this time, but I ran out of patience a drawer or two of socks ago. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 03:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users

Requested by Wuhwuzdat (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests
 * - To clear out the rest of the sock farm. Tiptoety  talk 03:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Ritzyditzy is ; I'm not sure about any of the others on the IP. I have blocked an IP range which will hopefully stop her. Dominic·t 08:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions


 * Katie Vaughan and Arpierson1993 indef'd. Ritzyditzy tagged and will be watched from now on. ~ fl 13:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 3 2009, 03:54 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets






 * Evidence submitted by Jauerback

The last sockpuppet investigation led to a rangeblock of 75.104.192.32/27. I'm just checking for collateral damage in case this needs to be extended to a broader range. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 03:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Jauerbackdude?/dude. 03:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Request for CheckUser
 * - While this probably could have been handled at Sockpuppet investigations, this works too. Endorsing to check for collateral damage per Jauerback's request above. Tiptoety  talk 06:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

75.104.192.32/27 has light enough traffic to justify a fairly long-term anonymous-only block, or short term hard blocks. Also, ✅ Veronica Hawkins is Arpierson1993 too. Dominic·t 07:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

blocked/tagged. Rangeblock performed by CU. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 11:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)