Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki/Archive

07 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Registered on same day, Volt60x was created 10 hours later. Edit warred over inserting double page move requests on Talk:Valmiki.--- For evading 3-revert rule, abused a number of IPs such as 70.39.187.250, 106.215.173.119, frequently contributed on Valmiki Caste with these accounts and the IP(106.215.173.119). Bladesmulti (talk) 05:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Just got to know that the reason why Volt60x was created 10 hours later, it was because Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki was blocked. Makes this case simpler. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

See Bladesmulti (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * IVillager is probably unrelated, must be his friend in real life but he has no participation in these 2 major subjects where these suspected accounts were heavily used. Volt60x was more traveled, that's why I had titled it as "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Volt60x". Investigation is over, move it to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅ to each. There is also a technical connection between these users and, so a behavioural review may be helpful in determining whether it's the same person.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  00:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Volt60x has engaged in quite a bit of disruption judging by the report at WP:AN3 (permalink). So I support indef of Volt60x and of Ashuto, who is presumably the same person. has made non-stop copyright violations since October (see his talk page) and seems not to be coming up the learning curve so it would not be a great loss to the encyclopedia to include him in the indef, if technical evidence supports it. EdJohnston (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

I've indeffed and tagged the two confirmed accounts. I'm not taking any action against IVillager, partly because I see little behavioral connection and partly because they haven't edited recently. If they return and persist in violating copyright, they can obviously be indeffed independent of this SPI. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

28 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Disruptive editing by on Valmiki Caste‎. Created an RFA, was advised against it by another user to which  replied 'Thank you'. Both accounts tell to "mind your business". Both accounts seem to have issues with adding white spacing after punctuations and before their signatures. ,,- NQ (talk)  16:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC) - NQ  (talk)  16:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

has already CU'd and blocked accordingly. - Sitush (talk) 17:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As noted by the sock account is blocked and tagged. The proxies have been hard blocked for 6 months and the master blocked 1 week.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Unclosing. Upon further review this is User:Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki and the report should be merged to Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki. I'll fix the tags.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Case merged, closing. Mike V • Talk 02:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)