Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Athenacat34/Archive

11 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User has made a single edit, which is very similar to those made by Athenacat34. There is also the similarity between usernames - Athenacat34 & Probablyacat123


 * Probablyacat123 edit here, with edit summary of "removed bias"


 * Athenacat34 edits here with edit summary of "made page less bias" and here with edit summary of "trying to make it more factually correct and remove bias"

Despite only being a few edits, I think the Duck Test is applicable. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The master account is, therefore I'm declining the checkuser request.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * indef'ed, which IMO is not "correct" -- the edit-warring POV issues (did the Soviets "win" the Space Race or "achieve an early lead"?) is specifically mentioned as not vandalism. My opinion is that a block after warning was appropriate, but a first-time indef might not have been; however the subsequent appeal seems to retroactively make the indef look justified. But that is besides the point of this SPI; behaviourally, Probablyacat123 has only made a single edit, which is not a lot to go on, but its content + the username tells me it is very likely to be the same user. I'm thus the sock for block evasion. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  22:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)