Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Athlinks Social/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Added the same thing to the Athlinks page, see and  My name is not dave  (talk/contribs) 19:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

What do you all want?

You asked that I got an account name that wasn't associated with the article in question -Done

You asked that in information added or edited be presented in a tonality that is neutral and does not promote.- Done

Yes. I do work for said company. That said, do you want me to email what I wrote to a media affiliate and have them post it in an article and then subsequently CITE the very work that I have already done? Where is the line. Everything in the unedited article before I came in to add is dated by several, several years. I am only looking to provide factual information in as neutral of tone as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotACorporateStooge (talk • contribs) 20:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is not sockpuppetry. Athlinks Social was blocked under the username policy with the explicit instruction to please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. Closing without action. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)