Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AuggiePaoli/Archive

08 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All of the above accounts appear to be SPAs hell-bent on preserving the Sergio Michel page. Three of the accounts (AuggiePaoli, RockFanUK and Lilly 4613) have recreated the page using identical sources (even down to the sections quoted):, ,. AuggiePaoli and Lilly4613 have made similar aggressive comments to other users ; note the use of phrases such as "reach out to Michel Media", similar syntax, ALLCAPS shouting and accusations of anti-semitism

There is a possibility, due to Lilly4613's mention of a "fan club", that these are in fact meatpuppets rather than sockpuppets; it seems that off-wiki canvassing is taking place regarding this article. The page is currently under threat of deletion via G5; I'm therefore requesting checkuser to help confirm specifically that Lilly4613 and AuggiePaoli are related - if not, the G5 notice can be taken down. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * To save the reviewing admin some time, I should also mention that three of the accounts are already blocked (AuggiePaoli and RockFanUk for vandalism, Lilly4613 as a suspected sock of AuggiePaoli). Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I've also added User:Wikibronx to the list, whose only edits have been to tag-bomb the article in question with speedy deletion notices - looks to me like a bad hand account created to add fuel to the fire. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'd like to clarify the above. My contributions to this article have not only been the tags for speedy deletion. Please see edit history. I have removed citations of Imdb trivia page which is against Wikipedia policy. I have corrected the wording in the body of the entry to accurately reflect the content of the pages they are citing (specifically the celebrity boxing citation) I have also removed citations for family crests which do not support or substantiate any particular claims made in the body of the article. I'm not a bad hand rather noticed the repeated reinstatement of this page that was previously deleted for lack of significance/notability. I am also erroneously listed above as a user hell bent on preserving the page when In fact I have been tagging for deletion. Please remove me from the list of people trying to keep the page active as the records indicate everything but. Please correct this Innacuracy before page is archived User:Wikibronx 12:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - with regards to RockFanUK and Lilly4613 as well as master. Bit lacking in evidence for IamVince, but CU on the others should pick up if there is any connection. Rschen7754 08:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Compliments for the clear and concise report & evidence. The following accounts are ✅ with each other:
 * Lilly4613 appears technically ❌, but given the behaviour overlap, I don't think it would be any loss to block it.
 * Wikibronx appears ❌, and IamVince hasn't been checked. WilliamH (talk) 11:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked 3 confirmed, tagging, closing. Rschen7754 11:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Lilly4613 appears technically ❌, but given the behaviour overlap, I don't think it would be any loss to block it.
 * Wikibronx appears ❌, and IamVince hasn't been checked. WilliamH (talk) 11:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked 3 confirmed, tagging, closing. Rschen7754 11:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)