Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azazaqq/Archive

Report date April 29 2009, 03:19 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Jayron32. talk . contribs


 * User is disrupting AFD discussion of pet article. Appears to be creating multiple accounts to continue disruption.  Asking for checkuser to confirm, and to block any sleepers, given this users apparent lack of regard for the one account policy.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  03:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Jayron32. talk . contribs 03:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

without any particular evidence of sleepers, this would be fishing. Mayalld (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Leaning towards a decline on this one. In obvious cases of socking, like this one, a CU is generally not warranted. Any reason to suspect there are other accounts? Nathan  T (formerly Avruch) 13:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Seeing as both of these accounts are quacking, they are both blocked. The main account is clearly a SPA and that coupled with socking = indef. Tiptoety  talk 18:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was just looking for a second opinion on this one before blocking.  If you guys feel this is blockable without CU evidence, I am cool with that too.  Thanks for your help! --Jayron32. talk . contribs  18:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okey-Dokey! In that case I will tag the socks and close the case. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 18:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Per above. Tiptoety  talk 18:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)