Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aziz090/Archive

Evidence submitted by Singularity42
Aziz090 is currently blocked for constant copyvio related articles on Malaysian films. See WP:ANI. One of the most recent articles he created just before he was blocked was Papadom (film), which was speedy deleted as a copyright violation.

During the block, the IP created the same article at Talk:Papadom (film). This was during a period of time when Aziz090 was doing a number of disruptive edits on his own talk page.

During his disruptive edits, Aziz090 accidentially revealed the IP address to be where he is editing from. Therefore, a Checkuser is unnecessary. Singularity42 (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Conclusions
Both IPs temporarily blocked, Aziz090 now indefinitely blocked for block evasion + persistent copyvios. MuZemike 23:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Singularity42
Prior to his indefinite block, Aziz090 had a history of creating Malaysian film related articles with copyright violations. After numerous warnings, he was eventually given a temporary block. He then used an IP address to evade his block and do the same copyright violations, leading to an indefinite block.

One of the last articles Aziz090 worked on was Papadom (film). Shortly after he was indefinitely blocked, the Haji jamaluddin account was created and immediate re-created Papadom (film), with identical copyright violations:. The copyvio material was removed, and the editor was cautioned about copyvios. Similar to Aziz090's MO, Haji jumaluddin quickly restored the same copyvio material, despite the warning.

In addition, Aziz090 kept uploading problem files at File:Papadom01.jpg and File:Papadom.jpg before his indefinite block. Haji jamaluddin tried to add those deleted files to the recreated article: here and here. He eventually uploaded the file again at File:Papadom019.jpg (which has its own issues regarding licensing).

Given the above, Haji jamaluddin is showing that he is just continuing where Aziz090 left of after being indef blocked for block evasion. Singularity42 (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Singularity42 (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

– Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that the two users are the same. No CU necessary. MuZemike 17:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
Blocked and tagged. MuZemike 17:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Singularity42
Besides the similar name, Azman090 is following the same MO as Aziz090 and his previous socks. That is, edits to Papadom (film) such as this one, where a link to a file is added in the format of "papadom[insert some number here].jpg".

Truthfully, if Aziz090 would agree to not do the disruptive behaviour that got him blocked in the first place, he may be able to come back under probation. But using socks to get around a block is not the correct process. Singularity42 (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Conclusions
Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 22:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)