Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/B.Bhargava Teja/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Makes similar kinds of uploads (distorts them heavily but calls them "cleaning", see his upload of this file) and shows a tendency to add "The film begins" or any variant to plot sections, another characteristic of Bhargav. Kailash29792 (talk)  17:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Observations: I have stuff to do, so I'll have to defer this investigation for a bit. If anyone else wants to give it a look, that would be appreciated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * MudhavatR was created 25 February 2020, roughly 10 days ago.
 * MudhavatR has made about 145 edits.
 * There are 65 areas of intersection between the two users, typically Indian Telugu-language film articles and images. 65 intersections out of 145 edits is a really hard-to-believe coincidence.
 * B.Bhargava Teja - "The film begins with"
 * B.Bhargava Teja - "The film begins with"
 * B.Bhargava Teja - "The film begins with"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on" - I'm amused that he added it here even though it was totally unnecessary.
 * MudavatR - "The film begins at"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on"

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - B.Bhargava Teja is . ST47 (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * .&#32;In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.
 * , life is too short to go hunting for the evidence you've already located, please provide diffs. Cabayi (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , the prose on Top Rankers closely matches that of Viswaroopam, including the mention of Telugu Philosophy film, and the Music Released on So & So Company. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  15:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Observations:
 * MudhavatR was created 25 February 2020, roughly 10 days ago.
 * MudhavatR has made about 145 edits.
 * There are 65 areas of intersection between the two users, typically Indian Telugu-language film articles and images. 65 intersections out of 145 edits is a really hard-to-believe coincidence.
 * B.Bhargava Teja - "The film begins with"
 * B.Bhargava Teja - "The film begins with"
 * B.Bhargava Teja - "The film begins with"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on" - I'm amused that he added it here even though it was totally unnecessary.
 * MudavatR - "The film begins at"
 * MudavatR - "The film begins on"
 * I have stuff to do, so I'll have to defer this investigation for a bit. If anyone else wants to give it a look, that would be appreciated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * , the additional evidence you provided was added by IP users, Special:Diff/944203504, Special:Diff/879644826, not by either of the accounts you've named.
 * , thanks, that's the evidence I'd hoped Kailash29792 would provide. Cabayi (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * . Nothing more to do. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * One additional note, IPs 183.83.72.166 and 124.123.50.117 as noted by Kailash both have significant intersections with B.Bhargava Teja and both are ACT Fibernet addresses geolocating to the Indian state of Telangana. So it seems likely that they are related. Mostly just mentioning this for future relevance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you for blocking him. The IP that created College Kumar (2020 film) is also his, so can you please delete that page created in violation of WP:BLOCKEVASION and move College Kumar (2020 Tamil film) to its place? Kailash29792 (talk)  01:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Typically we can only G5 speedy delete if there haven't been significant contributions to the article by others. I believe the early IPs are related to this sockmaster, but there is maybe a legitimate question as to whether others have contributed significantly. If you wouldn't mind scrolling through those other edits you could make an argument as to whether or not they were significant. If not, it could be deleted. If they were significant then maybe another approach, like an article merge, is warranted. These IPs have created several articles which might be problematic if this was B.Bhargava Teja evading his block. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
These IPs are being used by this user to continue to evade their block. The evidence of a connection:


 * Same interest in Telugu cinema.


 * Same dreadful English (sometimes entirely incomprehensible), just see any of the plot summaries that they have written.


 * Like Bhargava is known to, the IPs use "The film begins" and "Finally, the movie ends on a happy note..." in almost every plot summary they write, for examples see:


 * 1) IP 183.82.123.0/24:
 * 2) IP 2405:201:C00B:D000:0:0:0:0/52:. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 03:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Kailash29792: FYI. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 03:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, its probably not much use now, but it seems that B.Bhargarva Teja had an earlier account, which also got indeffed for the same reason: User:Bhargava Krishna. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 08:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * They are now restoring sock edits on 117.99.192.0/20. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 12:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Still at it on the most recent IPs: and  Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 00:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vanamonde93: Thanks. The /20 seems to have gone quiet. It looks like they weren't really active on it prior to late February, so it may not be a "long-term residence" so to speak. Also agree that CU wouldn't be of any use, they seem to have abandoned accounts long ago. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 04:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Also Same style   etc — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've blocked two ranges for a month, and a single IP address. The connections are obvious; I don't believe the master is even trying to hide. I've left the /20 IPV4 address be, as it seems not to have been used for a few days and there's a possibility of collateral damage. A CU isn't going to connect IP addresses to an account, so I don't believe a check is going to achieve anything here: we're just going to have to play whack-a-mole with the IPs. Tagging for clerk assistance in case I've missed anything: I'm not well-versed in the book-keeping aspects of SPI. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same MO, "The film begins with..." "Finally the films ends with...". No other IPs in this range that are active fit this sock, just this one — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looks like a duck to me, but the newest edit is a week old; we were too slow to respond. I see no purpose in blocking, and I really can't see what else is to be done, so marking for closure. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Just like the previous socks, "the film begins ..." "Finally, the movie ends on..." — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * 2 months. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 06:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Very much ducky. "Finally, the movie ends on..." — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 16:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you could tell him on his talk page what not to do, now that he is using an account rather than an IP? Kailash29792 (talk)  17:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I guess we could try — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I've left a comment on their talk page. Let's wait and see — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 20:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Guess he won't reply, and is continuing with his disruptive edits. We can block him per WP:DUCK. Kailash29792 (talk)  04:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 06:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
 Identical behavior Mach61 (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Connection is obvious based on language similarities. IP blocked. Nothing for a CU to do here, and I'm not immediately seeing other IPs making similar edits, so I'm marking for closure. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Seems consistent with previous IPs brought up here. User:NeosZanadu (talk) 15:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Connection is obvious, they are not trying to hide. I've blocked for two weeks; as far as I can see, there's nobody on that range except this user since the end of September. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
According to Kailash29792 this is a sock evasion. Reporting to SPI accordingly. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 14:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Here is the comment. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 14:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I know it is Bhargav because he always begins plot summaries with "The film begins", rewrites them completely with incoherent English (quite obviously he uses rewording software) and concludes with "finally the film/movie ends". Kailash29792 (talk)  14:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , behavioral connection is obvious. I'm not immediately seeing a blockable range. There isn't anything for a CU to do here. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)