Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/B694kp8d/Archive

18 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Editor uses sockpuppets to violate 3RR on Shenzhen and ownage of the article. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Though I like neither account, I oppose that any action be taken for now. B694kp8d has stopped editing even after his/her block expired, and has now apparently moved on to the other account on this page. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 06:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * While I agree that neither account was interfering with each other, I took a glance at WP:Multiple Accounts and on "Clean start under a new name" it says: "Clean-start accounts should not return to old topic areas, editing patterns, or behavior previously identified as problematic, and should be careful not to do anything that looks like an attempt to evade scrutiny." To be honest I think this editor wasn't evading his/her block, but as he/she has caused problems with 3rr like s/he did with the old account, I still think some admin action may need to be done. Minima  c  ( talk ) 06:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, this wouldn't exactly be "clean start" under WP:Multiple Accounts, but more like a name change. And yes, I agree that the administrative action should be taken on 3RR, not socking; once a connection is established, the new account's block duration can be incrementally logner w.r.t. B694kp8d's 24-hr block. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 07:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Per HXL. It does seem as though he's abandoned the old account for now anyway. If he starts editing again, action can then be taken. ( X! ·  talk )  · @543  · 12:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

26 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

B694kp8d was blocked for three-revert rule, it appears that another name was created to circumvent the block and has again 3 reverted on the same article Pattern of edits and edit summaries is indicative of these editors being one and the same. EricSerge (talk) 04:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I blocked the two as ducks, then noticed this here. Seems pretty obvious to me. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)