Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BGCTwinsEdit/Archive

22 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * OBWVixen started making edits a few days after BGCTwinsEdit received an indef block and immediately began editing the same articles. Here are a few similar diffs: ;
 * BGCTwinsEdit was blocked for persistent copyright infringement uploads (mainly to Jo Jo Offerman). QDOG122 only makes mobile edits, but added the copyrighted images to articles that BGCTwinsEdit regularly edited. LM2000 (talk) 03:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am being accused of being another account based on the articles I have edited? I attend a public schooling but have never abused my editing. I have done nothing wrong EXCEPT make all the pages I've edited better. I also don't like the fact that the user LM2000 is accusing me of Sock-puppetry for going against what He/She deems worthy for wikipedia. The accuser has been in numerous confrontaions for repeatedly deleting others work and replacing it with their own, if you take a look at the accusers, user:LM2000 (talk) page you will see numerous complaints. You cannot say I am a "Sock-puppet" due to me editing certain pages just because you dont like the contents. You have accused others of being sock-puppets for simply editing the same pages as others because it wasn't the way "You liked" which is completely unfair (FYI your talk page is the proof). You're basically a harassing control freak that wants everything your way and if you do not get it then you attempt to try and rally the troops against someone. That is truly sad. However as I said, I am not a sock-puppet account but this is not my personal IP address as it is a public schools. --OBWVixen (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Please understand that it is not what articles you edited, but how you edited them. All you had to do to get BGCTwinsEdit‎'s unblocked was to apologize and make it clear that you understood the copyright policy and would not deliberately violate it again.  You may insinuate that I am the one who is controlling over what I edit, but you are the one who created this new account to bypass that block.  Then, after doing that, you immediately return to revert HHH Pedigree, NiciVampireHeart, and TheRedPenOfDoom, all of whom had modified your edits.  If that wasn't enough, you just uploaded another image today that was clearly ripped from someone's twitter feed (the watermark of their twitter handle is in the photograph!).LM2000 (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are a ✅ technical match.  is a  match based on geolocation; any further linking of this account to the master will need to be made on a behavioural basis.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * OBWVixen tagged and blocked indef, don't have the time to look at behavior right now for the other. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing as I don't see clear enough behavioral evidence to block QDOG122. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)