Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BSCommunications/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Around 19:56, 7 July 2016‎ master removed a specific bit of negative, but sourced content, three times ended up blocked.

Next day, Mpleasants registers makes his only edit, the same removal. Warned and abandons account.

July 12, IP with his only edit (summary "I removed inaccurate and highly political information."), same removal.

July 13, Estudiante70, same removal twice here (edit summary "inaccurate information") and here (edit summary "not vandalism, intentional removal of inflammatory in inaccurate content"). Estudiante70 now using Talk:Bank Street College of Education to get content removed.

If this is a case of using multiple accounts, it is abusive because it skirts edit warring accusations, let alone the WP:PAID issue. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * BSCommunications and Estudiante70 are, although they could also be meat. Mpleasants is ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, fair enough. I asked at Estudiante70's talk and he said unrelated too and that he's a graduate student. Maybe the word just got around and students are showing up to help improve their school's image. Many thanks for the check. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * As per CU and Anne, there does not seem to be violations of sockpuppetry policy ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  17:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)