Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BaSH PR0MPT/Archive

Evidence submitted by JDDJS
Has barnstars from other user and a lot of his edits seem to be vandalism. I am not sure if he is sockpuppet but it seems possible and worth looking into. JDDJS (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Even if not a sockpuppet, this user does seem to be a vandal, or at least makes very bad edits. If needed, I will resubmit under vandal instead of sockpuppet. JDDJS (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

The user in question has been blocked for vandalism. Should this page be deleted because it is no longer needed or saved for records? JDDJS (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
– First off, Skull 'n' Femurs is very for CheckUser purposes; over 4 years ago. I don't even know if this is even worth looking into per possible WP:CLEANSTART concerns. –MuZemike 21:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I mean, that might be a better idea to report for vandalism if you think the user is persisting in chronic disruption - either at ANI or AIV (the latter if it's of the more blatant nature). I mean, this is four years ago we're talking about, assuming these are the same person (personally I have not looked close enough, but the timing is just not there). –MuZemike 21:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This was reported at AIV. The account has been used mostly for rather overt vandalism, so I've blocked it indef. I don't know if anything else is needed here. Kuru   (talk)  21:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC)