Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bablos939/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I believe all three accounts Bablos939, IP number 116.123.12.44 and 220.117.225.165 are related and socks of Bablos939. This happened in the interracial marriage talk page that is now in archive ' I also suspect Maomao4321 is related to Bablos939 based on the fact M7z ( a clerk/check user/admin ) claimed they are possibly possibly related.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Interracial_marriage/Archive_3 ( THE WHOLE CONVERSATION OF  116.123.12.44 and 220.117.225.165 Replying to Bablos939 and showing support )


 * EVIDENCE NO.1

2 of the IP number 116.123.12.44 and 220.117.225.165 appear to be only single purpose accounts in helping Bablos939 casting aditional votes and create false consensus image to help his data which I believed are cherrypicked and false. Neither of the 2 accounts had made any edits historically. They are just there to make one edit to support Bablos939 and never again replied. Bablos939 was told by to gain concensus by many editors historically by wikipedia users such as Beyond My Ken ,Shinoshijak, Banamu, John B123 who all have reverted Bablos939's edit and told him to gain concesus. I strongly believe those 2 IP are for that purpose, to help Bablos939 stack up concensus vote in the talk page discussion. I believe he is trying to cast additional votes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_sockpuppetry#Casting_additional_votes. The reason I suspect all 3 accounts are related to Bablos939 is because 116.123.12.44 ---> <--- and 220.117.225.165 ---> <--- BOTH ARE single purpose accounts that agrees everything with Bablos939 and supported everything he wrote. Also they've only ever replied once and never again did they responded back, meaning they could be all suckpuppets to help create a fake concensus. Also when I used the ip-address-lookup-v4 it shows both their their location is the exact same location from Seoul regions of South Korea ( not sure if I'm allowed to post it here but I will if you want ). Vamlos (talk) 03:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * EVIDENCE NO.2

Bablos939 have a history of having support from single purpose users. To offer more evidence supporting my claims is because previously a clerk/Check User/or Admin by the name of Mz7 have previously stated that Bablos939 is POSSIBLY RELATED to the single purpose accounts Maomao4321  ( A single purpose account that only offered supported for Bablos939 in the same interracial marriage talk page ) The important part is that Mz7 said " .......From what I understand, Maomao123 is so far a single-purpose account that has only participated in the discussion in support of Bablos939. On that basis, I checked Maomao123 and Bablos939, and they are "..... " Although the result was " Behavioural evidence needs evaluation". > .  The two new IP numbers of single purpose support to Bablos939 is evidence of behaviour beihg similar in helping Bablos939.

The results is found at the very bottom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chinese-proti/Archive

I now also added a account MaoMao4321 which I believe is sock and related. This is because MaoMao4231 also showed single purpose support in his comments


 * EVIDENCE NO.3

A one of many examples of Bablos939 using Korean google translations. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=ch8VBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA82&dq=indian+coolie+woman+chinese+men&redir_esc=y&hl=ko#v=onepage&q=indian%20coolie%20woman%20chinese%20men&f=false The fact that both of those IP numbers are also from South Korea can't be a coicidence.

Please check on this edit. All those google book links he used always comes with Korean google translations

--

REPLY TO Malcolmxl5

( Sorry I made a mistake. The correct number is 116.123.12.44 (changed it). He made one comment in support of Bablos939 and 220.117.225.165 also showed support for Bablos939. Both of them have IP address related to South Korea I believe. Also the fact that Bablos939 always have Korean google translations when ever he provides a link. Please check if all 3 are from South Korea. )

Sorry but than I don't understand the point of this rule if you cannot check those who are using sockpupprety to cast votes in their own favor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_sockpuppetry#Casting_additional_votes If I had not checked myself than Bablos939 would created a fake concensus because many previous editors told Bablos939 repeatedly to make concensus and those 2 single purpose comment IP number did just that.

Like all the google links Bablos939 posted leads him to Korean translations. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=ch8VBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA82&dq=indian+coolie+woman+chinese+men&redir_esc=y&hl=ko#v=onepage&q=indian%20coolie%20woman%20chinese%20men&f=false

Please check on the archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Interracial_marriage/Archive_3 All look here the original post made by Bablos933, you can see all his google links comes from Korean and both the IP numbers address also comes from South Korea 116.123.12.44 and IP 220.117.225.165. How doesn't that make them suspicious. Do you want me to post evidence that the IP numbers come from Seoul city of South Korea ? Am I allowed to show evidence that they came from South Korea. Vamlos (talk) 05:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)  REPLY TO Malcolmxl5Italic text
 * I'm not understanding your defence. Mz7 said Maomao4321 is POSSIBLY RELATED to Bablos939 because like M7z said " Maomao123 is so far a single-purpose account that has only participated in the discussion in support of Bablos939 ". And now clearly 116.123.12.44 and IP 220.117.225.165 address are both single purpose edit accounts that came out of nowhere to give support to Bablos939 by stacking up votes.


 * I can also provide the evidence immediatly that IP number 16.123.12.44 and IP 220.117.225.165 come from Seoul city of South Korea. And since every translations links of Bablos939 shows to be clearly Korean, that is high evidence to be suspect that they are all related.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamlos (talk • contribs) 05:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I simply want to know if 116.123.12.44 and IP 220.117.225.165 is geographically related to Bablos939. And I also added Maomao4321 to add more evidence because all three ( 116.123.12.44,  220.117.225.165 , Maomao4321 ) made single purpose comment to support Bablos939  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamlos (talk • contribs) 05:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

REPLY To Bablos939
 * Recently the blocked user Bablos939 (blocked 1 week for disruptive editing ) accused me with wrong accusations of being a user editing the K-pop wikipedia page. I'm actually a fan of K-pop myself but many people in this world are K-pop fans.Vamlos (talk) 07:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

REPLY
 * Today is the 19th of November. I've been waiting for roughly 1 and half month already. Really wish they do this investigation because I'm suspecting even more. The fact that Bablos939 always talks about me mentioning Korean shows he is related with South Korean. I strongly believe he is possibly from South Korea. Those 3 single purpose accounts just came and support him are also from South Korea with one comment and never again came back.Vamlos (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * IP 11.123.12.44 has not made any edits, IP 220.117.225.165 has made one. There is nothing to see here with regards to these. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The IP 11.123.12.44 has been amended to IP 116.123.12.44. IP 116.123.12.44 has made one edit. This does not change my opinion that there is nothing to see here. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry but both IP 116.123.12.44 and IP 220.117.225.165 clearly one purpose single comments IP when checking the https://ip-address-lookup-v4 it shows both are from S.Korea Seoul city'. They came up to support Bablos939, ONLY ONE COMMENT JUST TO SUPPORT BABLOS939. The reason why this happened because many editors/admins told Bablos939 to get concesus in talk page. Bablos939 also has Korean link translations. The fact that his google link translations are all in Korean shows all 3 of those accounts have Korean links. Or are you telling me as long as they one single comments to stack up votes and support that there is nothing wrong with it? No need to check.Vamlos (talk) 05:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please move your comments to the section above and keep your comments there. This is the section for 'other users'. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Blablos939 and Maomao4321 have already been investigated and the case was closed with no action taken with regard to these accounts. No new evidence is given here to link these accounts. Maomao4321 has not edited since that case so no new evidence will be forthcoming. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry I made a mistake. The correct number is 116.123.12.44 (changed it). He made one comment in support of Bablos939 and 220.117.225.165 correct. Both of them have IP address related to Seoul city South Korea. Also the fact that Bablos939 always have Koreann google translations when ever he provides a link. Please check if all 3 are from South Korea.Vamlos (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * A checkuser will not link accounts to IP addresses for privacy reasons (I am not a checkuser; I am a user commenting in the section for 'other users'). and there is not enough behavioural evidence here in my view to make any assessment. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Vamlos, I am not making a defence. I am an uninvolved 'other user' offering an opinion to the SPI clerks on this report. When they review it, they may accept or disregard my opinion as they see fit. I suggest you now wait for their review. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Vamlos is suspected of being a doll.[] (Not only me, but other debater doubt him.) He has a lot of interest in 'Korea' alone. [] And he insulted Korea alone and Maybe he eventually called Korean user... He is now playing pranks in Wikipedia. It is sad for him but my IP address is different......Bablos939 (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Maybe Vamlos is 'IP:70.77.154.228'. Please compare the links: [], [] '70.77.154.228'  He edited a document about South Korea-based girl group.        [] This contributions[] cannot be made unless He is closely related to Korea. Even though he is related to Korea by himself, he is actually passing the buck to other user. he is mocking the Wikipedia system.... Bablos939 (talk) 23:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I think there is enough evidence to prove that the two IPs listed are Bablos, but it has been over a month since the more recent one edited and I feel a block at this time would be punitive rather than preventative. Closing without action. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obviously not a new user. Re-opened WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Watersinfalls as their 5th edit ever. There's a whole mess of sockyness going on here, that's been spread out over a number of related SPIs:


 * Sockpuppet investigations/Watersinfalls
 * Sockpuppet investigations/Rajmaan
 * Sockpuppet investigations/Vamlos
 * Sockpuppet investigations/Bablos939
 * Sockpuppet investigations/Chinese-proti

it's unclear how many of those are actually the same sock, but there's now clear (on-wiki) behavioral evidence that Bablos939 is Skyslandscanner; email me for details. I've already blocked both of those, opening this mostly for the record. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''