Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Baconstrip rocket/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)
 * ( originally filed under this user)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlotte,_North_Carolina&diff=prev&oldid=989536719 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlotte,_North_Carolina&diff=prev&oldid=989536510 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlotte,_North_Carolina&diff=prev&oldid=989536484 — ~ SkiMaskA ~  💬 msg me 15:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Obvious socks, but the fact that the oldest account is named "Baconstriprocket2" (note to future self: rename case) makes me suspect there may be sleepers. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Moving SPI report to correct master.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, they're ✅.
 * Also found and ✅:
 * Indef'd and tagged. No other sleepers I could find.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Indef'd and tagged. No other sleepers I could find.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Moving under new correct master given CU evidence found.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Just out of curiosity (and assuming you can answer), how did you find if they're stale? -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * RoySmith - If I remember correctly, the user logged in (which we can see), but didn't edit.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * TIL why User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/sockStaleness.js only says "probably stale". -- RoySmith (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)