Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambolinaz/Archive

29 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Thank you! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Brand-new-user-account, starts AFD on 2nd day of editing diff.
 * 2) Editor comments at the AFD: "Bad faith nomination by an apparent sock."
 * 3) Tagged as WP:SPA account by at diff.
 * 4) Requesting Checkuser investigation to determine other underlying active and/or latent sleeper socks.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * With no master/sock accounts to compare against, this appears to be a bit of a guessing game. The evidence provide isn't enough to warrant a check or a block. We can't use a person's suspicions of the account as evidence and just because an account edits at AfD doesn't mean we should immediate assume that it's a sock or meatpuppet. If you have more concrete evidence later to back up you claims, we can look at it then. For now, I'm closing this case with no action taken. Mike V  •  Talk  23:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, no worries, just that it wasn't my concerns but those of and . Thank you for looking into it, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)