Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Banchanseoul/Archive

Evidence submitted by X!
Filing paperwork, closing in a second. ANI thread:. History: ( X!  ·  talk )  · @313  · 06:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Closing as I said I would ( X! ·  talk )  · @313  · 06:31, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Phoenix7777

 * All editors are pro-Korean editors.
 * Coconut91 and 74.72.15.7 were blocked at the same time for disruptive edits of List of tributaries of Imperial China and Tribute.
 * Coconut91, 74.72.15.7 and 147.4.194.72 edited the same minor Korean articles one after another like a tag team.
 * Coconut91 and 74.72.15.7 took exactly the same period of Wiki-breaks. 11 August 2010 to 20 August 2010 and 13 September 2010 to 18 September 2010.
 * Fixed-ip 74.72.15.7 is probably used in home (Whitestone, NY) and 147.4.194.72 is used in school (Hofstra university, Hempstead, NY). The distance is 15 miles. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Coconut91 and 74.72.15.7 edited at the same time of the day. Being up late in the EST area.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Comment from uninvolved user Sailsbystars

Looks pretty marginal to me. I'm not seeing the overlap between edits indicated by the submitter. The closest similarity I can find is that they both want to POV push that Korea is responsible for domesticating beans, but in separate articles: Soybeans and Azuki beans. There are no overlapping article edits between the two users. i.e. they never edited the same article as far as I can tell. So I would recommend against a block. Cheers, Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 19:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm referring to the 74. IP and user Coconut91 in my comment above. Cheers, Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 19:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * I've merged the case from Sockpuppet investigations/Coconut91. Banchanseoul, Goguryeohistory and Stopcyberbullying were all previously blocked for sockpuppeting. Also I'm fairly sure that the data for Truthinscholarship and Hellohello902a are stale, so this is going to have to be by behavior alone. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The main purpose of this investigation is to check currently active Coconut91 and 74.72.15.7. It is easily identified by Checkuser. So I retract Truthinscholarship and Hellohello902a, could this investigation be the Checkuser processing? ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 21:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I retracted this case. Instead, I re-submit Sockpuppet investigations/Coconut91 as a Check User case. Please close this case. 20:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are you looking to compare Coconut91 to? The other accounts listed are stale so we can't use CI to compare them, and we're not going to use CU to fish for other accounts. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree with Sailsbystars here; it's possible they're the same, but I'm not sure that there's really enough to go on. Anyway, none of them have edited in a few days, so I'm going to close this for now. Relist if it becomes an issue again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)